World Wide Wolfmueller

Law and Gospel in Joyful Clarity

Category: Theology (page 1 of 5)

Roots Campus Ministry Lectures: The Next 500 Years of the Reformation

It was wonderful to be invited by the students of Lindenwood to reflect on the next 500 years of the Reformation. What a question!

In these videos I reflect on how the Christian should think about the future, and how the Christian can have a pure understanding of tomorrow. We push on the dominance of technology, the three estates, the role of faith, love, and hope in considering these things.

If you have the interest and time to watch, I’d love to hear your thoughts.

First Lecture:

 

Second Lecture:

 

All the conference videos can be found on the conference YouTube channel.

PrBW

The Ministerial vs Magisterial Use of Feelings

In the fight about the authority of the Bible there was a helpful distinction made: “the Ministerial” versus “the Magisterial use of reason.”

The defenders of the authority of the Scripture noticed that the liberal movement in the church was letting their reason rule over the texts. This is the “Magisterial use” of reason. The more conservative said that our reason should serve the text, but standing below the text. Our reason has limits, and it is not free to overthrow the text or change the meaning of the text to suit its fancy. This is the “Ministerial use” of reason: reason is a minister to serve the text. We understand our reason to be a gift of God to help us love and serve God, but our reason has limits. Reason, then, does not stand above the Scriptures, but sits below them as a humble servant.

I think this distinction is helpful as we consider the role of emotions and feelings in our own life and confession. We recognize a “Ministerial” and a “Magisterial” use of feelings, and we want to encourage a ministerial use, the proper use of our feelings and emotions.

We see, first, the abuse, the magisterial use of feelings, especially in the American Evangelical churches. Consider, for example, the altar call where the preacher asks, “Do you feel the Holy Spirit tugging in your heart?” Consider the conversations with your friends where they’ve confessed you that they “don’t feel close to God anymore” or “are going through a dry spell.” Remember the small group Bible Studies where the participants were asked, “How do you feel about this verse?”

For many American Evangelicals their “walk with God” began when they first felt the Holy Spirit in their heart, and their confidence that they are still Christian is confirmed in the weekly worship experience where they “feel the presence of God.”

We can trace the origins of this emphasis on feelings back to Charles Finney (author of the Second Great Awakening who taught that our wills are free but manipulatable, and invented “new measures” to do the manipulating) or John Calvin (who distinguished “two species of calling” and said that the true calling to be a Christian was the work of the Holy Spirit in the heart) or the devil himself (who in the Garden tempted Adam and Eve away from the clear external word of God to their own internal judgment, a theological move identified by Martin Luther as “enthusiasm”). No matter where we trace the source, we note that for much of American Evangelicalism, and, indeed, for most Christians of any type, the theater of spiritual activity is internal, in the heart. And the way we identify and talk about this inner life is through the language of emotion. “I feel moved, touched, blessed, etc.”

There is a larger trend in our culture to replace “I think” and “I believe” with “I feel,” but this is paralleled and even amplified in the Christian church with disastrous results. Our feelings, then, become the chief source of information about how it is with God and me. We look for comfort and certainty in our feeling close to God. When we live by the feelings we also die by the feelings. How many times have we heard, “I’m going through a dry spell”? “I don’t feel close to God.” “I don’t feel like God hears my prayers.” “I just wasn’t feeling it in church this morning.” When we look to our feelings for assurance and comfort, they are gone just as often as they are found. Our emotions are liquid, and the Christian looking for confidence via their emotions is like the ship tossed on the waves of the sea.

Our feelings become a hermeneutical principle. We read the Bible with our emotions. “How to you feel about this text?” “How does this passage make you feel?” When we are “touched” and “moved” by the passage then we take note of it. If we are not, we let the passage go. We approach the text asking the question, “What does this mean to me?” instead of simply asking “What does this mean?”

This goes even farther. Often times Christians are taught that they are to listen for the voice of God. “Prayer is a two-way conversation” we hear: we talk to God, and God talks to us. But how? Internally, in the heart, and that this voice is often an impression, a thought, or a feeling. This practice is nowhere in the Scriptures, but it is so common that it is rarely questioned.

We can identify all this as the “Magisterial Use of Emotions,” our emotions and feelings are understood to be a trustworthy authority. Our feelings teach us what is right. We look to our emotions to understand the scriptures. We interpret our feelings as the voice of God. We pin our confidence of God’s presence and kindness on our mood.

We reject the “Magisterial Use of Emotions” as unbiblical and dangerous.

A lot of pastoral care is fighting against the authoritarian rule of emotions. “Pastor, I just don’t feel close to God anymore.” “Well,” I respond, “Do you have a promise that God is near you, like the words of Jesus, ‘I will be with you always’?” “Yes.” “Well then, your feelings are lying to you.”

“I feel like a divorce would be best.” Your feelings are lying.

“I feel like I’m not forgiven.” Your feelings are lying.

“I feel like God will understand why I’m so angry and sinning against this person.” Your feelings are lying.

“I feel like God has forgotten me.” Your feelings are lying.

Who taught us to trust our feelings in the first place? Disney? It wasn’t Jesus. He wants us to be sure, certain, confident, unwavering. It’s difficult to find a more wavering thing than our feelings and emotions. If building a house on sand is dangerous, how much worse is it to build a house on clouds.

The Lutheran fathers, with great pastoral wisdom, are always directing us to the “external Word,” the words of the prophets and apostles which is outside of us. God speaks to us in His Word. He tells us His will in His Word. He gives us commands and instructions, promises and blessings in His Word.

When we want to know what God thinks of us, what God wants us to do, what the future holds, we don’t look to our feelings or our emotions, we look to the Word. There is no doubts, no wonderings, no uncertainties, no wavering. The words which will endure forever are established for us and our faith, our confidence in God. “This says the Lord” stands firm in the midst of the unpredictable storm of our emotions.

Is there a proper place for our emotions, our feelings, and other aspects of our inner life? Yes indeed. The Scriptures often speak of our emotions and feelings. In fact, our definition of repentance as contrition and faith is, at least in part, an emotional definition: we sorrow over our sins and we rejoice in the promise of the Gospel. The Psalms are pressed down and overflowing with emotions. Jesus, who never sinned, wept, rejoiced, was angry, disappointed, and sorrowful. He had the full range of human emotions. While we warn the Christian of the dangers of the Magisterial use of emotions, we want to promote the Ministerial use of emotions.

Here, then, are a few thoughts about the proper place of emotions in the Christian life.

First, we recognize that our emotions are part of our created humanity. Like everything else God created, our emotional inner life was good, but is now corrupt and twisted by sin.

Second, our emotions, then, are subject to the rule of the Lord’s Law. Consider the 9th and 10th commandments, “You shall not covet.” The Ten Commandments extend the rule of God even over our inner life. Our desires, our wants, our thoughts, even our emotions are subject to God and His governance. This means, at least, that our emotions can be sins. Our being happy or our being sad, our desires or our lack of desire, all of these things can be sins.

This is a simple point, but should not be missed. The Magisterial Use of Feelings exalts our emotions above God’s law, make the law subject to our feelings. The first step in putting things back in their proper order is to put our feelings under the rule of the Ten Commandments. I can be wrongly happy. My anger can be sin. My desires can be false. My feelings can be wrong. Just like our words and our deeds, our feelings and emotions can offend God and hurt our neighbor. Just like our other sins, our emotional sins are confessed and forgiven.

We ought to give a fuller consideration to anger, but in passing, we notice that there is a right and a wrong use of anger. When anger is executed according to office (like a parent punishing a child for something, or a judge sentencing a person to prison) it can be good. But when anger is bound up to our person (and not to an office, i.e. anger as an emotion) then things go very wrong very fast.

Also, a word about desire. It is important to note that desire itself is not a sin, everything depends on the object of desire. If I desire the right thing, God’s Word, for example, or eternal life, or a peaceful life for my family, my desire is good. My desire for another’s house, or wife, or life, or hurt, or god, all of these desires are false and dangerous. God’s Word, then, also points our emotions to their right object and insists that they grow from the proper source.

Two-and-a-half, because our emotions are subject to God’s law, they cannot be set against the law of God. Neither are they an end in themselves. I am often asked, “Doesn’t God want me to be happy?” The answer: “Probably not.” Our emotional state is a servant, not the master, and certainly not the goal.

The conversation usually goes something like this: “Pastor, the only way I will be happy is if I get a divorce. Doesn’t God want me to be happy?” “God wants you to be married.” Happiness is the last of God’s concerns. He puts happiness (or contentment) at the end of the commandments, so that happiness comes after we go to church, say our prayers, honor our parents, care for the lives of our neighbors, live in chastity and faithfulness, work hard and are generous, and tell the truth. Then happiness. God is certainly unhappy if we set happiness (or any other emotional state) against His commands.

Third, then, our emotions can also be good works. Just as the Law condemns wrong emotions, it praises right emotions. Consider, as a small example, Paul’s words to the Philippians, “it is right for me to feel this way about you” (Philippians 1:7). Paul’s feelings of affection, thankfulness, and confidence were good and right. “Blessed is the man… his delight is in the Law of the Lord” (Psalm 1:1,2). Just as sin is conceived in wrong desires (James 1:14-15), so good works begin with a desire for what is good. “As new born babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby” (1 Peter 2:2).

The Lord’s Prayer is especially helpful here. As we pray the seven petitions we are learning what to want, what to desire: God’s name holy with us, His kingdom come to us, His will, His provision, His forgiveness, His leading, His deliverance. We desire these things and we delight in these things. We abhor evil. We rejoice in truth. The Psalms expand on this, taking our emotions and feelings up in prayer to God, all the anger, frustration, joy, confusion, disappointment, sorrow, panic, rage, wonder, loneliness, all of it is wrestled with and, at last, brought to the feet of God where our emotions bow down to worship.

Forth, and finally (at least for today), the devil would use our emotions to lie to us about God. Our emotions and feelings are often found contradicting the truth of the Scripture, and especially the truth of the Gospel. These emotions arise in the conscience, feelings especially of guilt and shame. Here we must simply put our feelings next to the promises of God, and let the promises win.

“I don’t feel forgiven” must submit to the promise “Whoever’s sins you forgive are forgiven.”

“I don’t feel close to God” must bow to the promise “I will never leave you or forsake you.”

“I feel like God has forgotten me and abandoned me” must acquiesce to the promise “I will never forget My people, I have not left you as orphans, even when You walk through the valley of death, I am with you.”

This is the Ministerial Use of Emotions.

When our emotions match the commands and promises of God, we rejoice that the truth of the Word is echoing in our hearts. But when our feelings contradict God’s Word, we let them go, and find our certainty and peace not in what we feel, but in what God says.

 

“By this we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him. For if our heart condemns us, God is greater that our heart, and knows all things. Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence toward God.” 1 John 3:19-21

 

Mortis Dulcia Nomina, “The Sweet Names of Death”

Tucked away in a few footnotes in volume three of Pieper’s Dogmatics is this gem of comfort, both for pastors and die-ers: the sweet names of death.

 

Beautiful stuff. Pieper says in the text, “Every Christian, and especially every teacher in the Church, ought to know [the mortis dulcia nomia] well and use them” (Piepers Dogmatics III.511).

Here, then, is our comforting and lovely list of the “Sweet Names of Death”:

  • “Gathered to one’s people” (Genesis 25:8, 17).
  • “Departure in peace” (Luke 2:29).
  • “Depart and be with Christ” (Philippians 1:23).
  • “Taken from evil” (Isaiah 57:1).
  • “Sleep” (Matthew 9:24; John 11:11; 1 Thessalonians 4:13; Daniel 12:2).
  • “Rest” (Revelation 14:13; Hebrews 4:11).
  • “Passing from death to life” (John 5:24).
  • “Deliverance from evil” (2 Timothy 4:18).
  • “Gain” (Philippians 1:21).

May God grant us joy in His victory over death.

PrBW

 

Martin Luther on “The One Great Book”

Here’s another little gem from Lenker’s introduction in Luther’s Genesis, a quotation from Luther on having too many books.

“The aggregation of large libraries tends to direct men’s thoughts from the one great book, the Bible, which ought, day and night, to be in every man’s hand. My object, my hope, in translating the Scriptures, was to check the so prevalent production of new works, and so to direct men’s study and thoughts more closely to the divine Word. Never will the writings of mortal man in any respect equal the sentences inspired by God. We must yield the place of honor to the prophets and apostles, keeping ourselves prostrate at their feet as we listen to their teaching. I would not have those who read my books, in these stormy times, devote one moment to them which they would otherwise have consecrated to the Bible.” (Martin Luther, Table Talk)

PrBW

What We Can and Can’t Do, the Two Tables of the Law

To warm us up, here is some handy theological vocabulary: “The Two Tables of the Law.”

When Moses brought the Ten Commandments down from Mt. Sinai they were written on two tablets (see Exodus 32:5-16). With this in mind, students of the Scripture have seen two groups of commandments, the first having to do with God, and the second having to do with our neighbor.

The “First Table of the Law,” then, describes our fear, love, and trust of God, our exclusive worship God, our prayers, and our hearing the Lord’s Word.

The “Second Table of the Law,” beginning with the commandment “Honor your father and your mother” gives shape to our love for our neighbors.

Jesus beautifully summarizes both tables when asked about the greatest commandment:

“The first of all the commandments is, ‘Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength:” this is the first commandment.

And the second is like, namely this, ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’ There is none other commandment greater than these.” (Mark 12:29-31)

Now, when it comes to good works, we normally think of the Second Table of the Law, and especially the outward works of love and kindness to our neighbor. When I help someone, give to those in need, etc., I think, “Good Work!”

Likewise, we normally think of sins according to the Second Table of the Law,  those things we do to hurt our neighbor: murder, theft, adultery, etc. When you as someone to list the Ten Commandments, which comes first? “You shall not murder. You shall not steal.” Second Table.

There is no doubt that the Second Table defines good works and sin, but this is only half of the Law.

These outward works are what the Lutheran Confessions call “civil works.” They are the good works taught by the philosophers. These are the kinds of good works that we can manage with our own reason or strength.

But, and this is the point, there is an entire world of sin and good works taught in the First Table of the Law, the works that have to do with God. When the Lutheran Confessors speak of Good Works, these are the works they are thinking of.

Here is an example from The Apology to the Augsburg Confession:

Image result for philip melanchthonIt is false, too, that by its own strength reason can love God above all things and keep his law, truly fear him, truly believe that he hears prayer, willingly obey him in death and in his other visitations, and not covet.

But reason can produce civil works. (Apology IV:27)

I find this list of good works astonishing, and I hope you are surprised as well. When Philip Melanchthon thinks of true and Christian works, he lists:

  1. Loving God above all.
  2. Truly fearing God.
  3. Truly believing that God hears our prayers.
  4. Willingly obeying God in death and other troubles (called God’s “visitations”!).
  5. Not coveting.

These are the good works of the First Table. (Mostly. “Coveting” is covered in Commandments 9 and 10, but remember how St. Paul equates covetousness with idolatry in Colossians 3:5.)

These things cannot be accomplished by our own reason and strength. In fact, even by the strength of the Holy Spirit working through the Word, we only begin to accomplish these things.

Now, both the theological and practical results of focusing on the Second Table of the Law and forgetting the First is disastrous. Here’s some more Melanchthon (well worth our time to digest):

Image result for philip melanchthonIf the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, then the flesh sins even when it performs outward civil works. If it cannot submit to God’s law, it is certainly sinning even when it produces deeds that are excellent and praiseworthy in human eyes.

Our opponents concentrate on the commandments of the second table, which contain the civil righteousness that reason understands. Content with this, they think they satisfy the law of God. Meanwhile they do not see the first table, which commands us to love God, to be sure that God is wrathful at our sin, to fear him truly, and to be sure that he hears us.

But without the Holy Spirit, the human heart either despises the judgment of God in its smugness, or in the midst of punishment it flees and hates his judgment. So it does not obey the first table. It is inherent in man to despise God and to doubt his Word with its threats and promises.

Therefore men really sin even when they do virtuous things without the Holy Spirit; for they do them with a wicked heart, and (Romans 14:23) “whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.” Such people despise God when they do these things, as Epicurus did not believe that God cared for him or regarded or heard him. This contempt for God corrupts works that seem virtuous, for God judges the heart. (Apology IV.33-35)

If the Law is merely the Second Table it becomes “doable” by my own reason and strength. If I define righteousness only according to the Second Table, then I can achieve it with my own efforts.

And, apart from faith, that is, a trust in the promise fo the forgiveness of all my sins won for me by the death of Jesus on the cross, then all my outward civil good works are stained, and, in fact, a cause for judgment.

The good works that God require of us are much more than the outward acts of love for our neighbor. God requires our worship, our fear and love and trust, our confidence in His goodness even in the midst of trouble and death. Our flesh is much too weak to accomplish these things. We are guilty of breaking God’s Law at the primary point, at the First Commandment.

We have some hope and chance of achieving a human civil righteousness according to the Second Table of the Law. But there is no hope of righteousness in ourselves when it comes to the First Table. Our only hope is Christ.

Melanchthon will bring it all home (and don’t skip this because it is a quotation. These words are the entire reason I wrote this post.):

Image result for philip melanchthonPaul says (Romans 4:15), “The law brings wrath.” He does not say that by the law men merit the forgiveness of sins. For the law always accuses and terrifies consciences. It does not justify, because a conscience terrified by the law flees before God’s judgment. It is an error, therefore, for men to trust that by the law and by their works they merit the forgiveness of sins.

We have said enough about the righteousness of law or of reason which our opponents teach. …

Therefore men cannot keep the law by their own strength, and they are all under sin and subject to eternal wrath and death. On this account the law cannot free us from sin or justify us, but the promise of the forgiveness of sins and justification was given because of Christ. He was given for us to make satisfaction for the sins of the world and has been appointed as the mediator and the propitiator.

This promise is not conditional upon our merits but offers the forgiveness of sins and justification freely. (Apology IV,38-41)

Amen.

PrBW
Trinity 2, 2017

The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article IV. Read online here. 

 

 

 

“Has American Christianity Failed?” Study Guide and Questions

Many thanks to Pr Mark Moreno for putting together this study guide of “Has American Christianity Failed?”

Has Christianity Failed_ Study Questions

Study Guide:

Has Christianity Failed?                                                               Discussion Questions

 

Chapter One – Examining the Characteristics of American Christianity

  1. Revivalism teaches that the Christian life begins with a personal decision to accept Christ (p.14). Why is this appealing? What is the danger?
  2. Pietism teaches that the Christian life is chiefly marked by growth in good works (p.15). Why is that appealing? What is the danger?
  3. Mysticism teaches that we can have direct, unmediated access to God (p.18). Why is that appealing? What is the danger?
  4. Enthusiasm teaches that the spiritual life happens inside of us (p.21). Why is that appealing? What is the danger?
  5. Legalism puts the Law above the Gospel by establishing requirements for salvation beyond repentance and faith in Jesus Christ (p.22). Why is that appealing? What is the danger?
  6. Moralism teaches that the Gospel can be reduced to improvements in behavior (p.28). Why is that appealing? What is the danger?
  7. The parable of the Prodigal Son has “three slaveries”: Slavery to passion and sin, slavery to despair of God’s mercy, and slavery obedience to God’s commandments (p.33). Why do we tend towards slavery instead of sonship?

 

Chapter Two – God Speaks

  1. The three attributes that American Christianity gives the Bible are inspiration, inerrancy and infallibility (p.42). Why isn’t this enough?
  2. The clarity of the Bible is something we believe in as Lutherans that many other Christians simply don’t believe. Is Scripture clear?
  3. The Bible is sufficient, it is enough for our life and our faith. Why do some argue that it isn’t? Does the Bible answer the question “what is God’s will for my life?”?
  4. We believe the Bible is efficacious, it has power and authority. If one loses sight of this truth, what happens?
  5. Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth. The Bible as instruction manual is horrible. What are the shortcomings with this approach?
  6. Our doctrine IS our salvation (p.51). Reaction?
  7. Why are these two questions important when reading Scripture? 1) What is God teaching about Himself? 2) Where is the Comfort?
  8. The Bible is awesome? Why and how??

Chapter Three – How Bad a Boy Are You?

  1. American Christianity softens the Bible’s teaching on sin (p.58). How does revivalism, pietism and/or mysticism feed into that?
  2. Original sin is the sin we have through Adam. Why is that an important doctrine?
  3. Sin, death and the devil are always together. What does that mean?
  4. Our sinful nature comes first, then our sinful actions. What difference does that make?
  5. Which of the three functions of the law (curb, mirror, guide) is most compelling to you?
  6. The discussion of free will (p.66ff) if critical to our understanding of our relationship to God. Do we have free will or not?
  7. When we see Jesus on the cross, we see what we deserve (p.70). What does Jesus suffering and death say about our sin?

 

Chapter Four – The One who is Always and Only for You

  1. Much of American Christianity is focused in the Christian and not on Christ (p.73). Have you seen this? Fallen for it?
  2. The Old Testament is all about Jesus. Which of the three texts made the most profound impact on you?
  3. In Genesis 3:15, we hear a pronouncement against the devil, and his offspring sin and death. Had you heard it unpacked that way before?
  4. The OT sacrificial system points us to Jesus. What does American Christianity do with the OT in general and sacrifices in particular?
  5. The cross is our theology; our preaching and teaching centers on it. Is the cross absent in American Christianity? More than just the sanctuary?
  6. Jesus suffering and death on the cross centers on physical pain, shame and spiritual agony. Why does modern theology tend to not preach or teach on this or the wrath of God?

 

Chapter Five – Your Name: Righteous

  1. What is the Great Exchange?
  2. The Gospel is not the fact of the cross or the event of the cross. It is the word of the cross, the promise of the cross. What does this mean?
  3. Repentance is the requirement and the result of God’s Word coming to mankind. How do the parables of Luke 15 demonstrate this?
  4. The two parts of repentance include 1) contrition that affirms we are sinners deserving of God’s wrath and 2) faith. American Christianity thinks this happens once or a handful of times. Why is that so wrong?
  5. Conversion is God’s work. Why isn’t it our work, our decision?
  6. The righteousness of the Gospel belongs to Jesus but is graciously given to us. What is “passive” righteousness?
  7. What does the Office of the Keys have to do with absolution? Forgiveness?
  8. A good conscience is not a conscience without sin…A good conscience is a forgiven conscience (p.116). Did the court room analogy help this concept for you?

 

Chapter Six – Go Play Outside

  1. Why does American Christianity seem to keep the spiritual life on the “inside”? What is lost by this?
  2. The kingdom of God comes by promise and by faith, and Jesus connects this promise to water. How do you find the Spirit? Feel the Spirit?
  3. American Christianity distrusts anything that is “outside” of us. Why? What is being missed out on?
  4. Baptism is Gospel: the gift of God for the salvation of sinners. Why does American Christianity deny this truth?
  5. Infant baptism is so anathema to American Christianity. Why should infants be baptized?
  6. The Lord’s Supper IS the body and blood, it IS the bread and wine. It brings life and salvation! Why would American Christianity minimize it by saying it is just symbolic?

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter Seven – The How of Good Works

  1. American Christianity is confused about the how, what and the why of good works. What is the proper view of these?
  2. How is baptism the battleground of the Christian life?
  3. The four states of man’s will (and charts on p.149) is a compelling topic. Did it clear anything up?
  4. The four parts of the Christian good work includes what (p.154)? Why does that matter?
  5. All good works are completely impossible without faith. True or false? Why?
  6. Of the three danger consciences (p.158ff) which is the one you battle most?
  7. How does suffering fit into the Christian life?

 

Chapter Eight – The Gift of a Neighbor and the Beginning of Love

  1. Christian love is sacrifice, it is selfless, it is death (p.169). What is wrong with loving yourself?
  2. Scriptures locate good works first in our homes and then with the folks we live and work with (p. 172). Why is vocation essential to understanding good works?
  3. Worship is being served by Jesus (p.176). It’s about God’s work and Word, His speaking and giving. How does that challenge us? American Christianity?
  4. What’s wrong with “Relationship theology”?
  5. Piety is the way our doctrine looks when lived (p.184). Piety flows from baptism, not a decision to follow Christ. How does baptism connect to daily life?
  6. Of the three theological truths on page 187, which one stands out to you? Why?

 

Chapter Nine – Wrestling with God: Why Prayer is Suffering

  1. The Command of Prayer is an invitation. How is this comforting?
  2. The Promise of Prayer includes that He hears and answers! Have you thought that all along?
  3. Jesus teaches us what we really need in this life. What is that?
  4. The words we pray from scripture have an advantage over our “heart felt” prayers. What?
  5. Prayer is taught! What have you learned about prayer from this chapter?
  6. Prayer is warfare. Have you heard the term prayer warrior? How is that accurate?
  7. Evangelism and mission are not to be motivated by worry or anxiety. Is Hope guilty of this?

 

Chapter Ten – The End of the World as We Know It

  1. Why is American Christianity obsessed with the End Times?
  2. American Christianity tends to premillennialism which teaches Jesus will come again to establish His Kingdom on Earth. How does that reflect in other parts of their theology?
  3. Why do dispensationalists make a distinction between Israel and the Church? What danger does that pose?
  4. What is the danger of the so-called “consistent, literal interpretation”?
  5. Is history about the glory of God or the salvation of mankind?
  6. The author gave five rules to reading the Book of Revelation (p.227ff). Which of those jumps out at you?

 

Chapter Eleven –  Surprised by the Gospel

  1. The Gospel is always a surprise. Is that true? Why?
  2. Sin forgiven for you, sin destroyed for you, death swallowed up for you; how is this Gospel surprising?
  3. Jesus undoes so much with a word; how does He have that power?
  4. How is the Lutheran Church an alternative to American Christianity? What can we do to proclaim the treasure that is the Gospel?

 

+ SDG +

Rev. Dr. Mark Moreno

Genesis 1:26, “Let Us Make Man,” Luther’s defence of the Trinitarian Teaching

In Genesis 1:26 we hear the conversation of the Godhead about the creation of humanity:

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

This text has long been treasured by Christians as the teaching of the Trinity in the Old Testament. But this confession has also been disputed.

In Luther’s commentary on Genesis he takes us the arguments for and against this text.

The word “Let Us make” is aimed at making sure the mystery of our faith, by which we believe that from eternity there is one God and that there are three separate Persons in one Godhead: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Jews indeed try in various ways to get around this passage, but they advance nothing sound against it. This passage bothers them to death, to use an expression of Occam, who applies it to irksome and difficult problems which he cannot solve.

Luther will then take up the objections against the Trinitarian reading. There are three other possibilities. God could be talking to the angels, to the earth, or to other creatures.

The Jews, then, say that God is speaking thus with the angels, likewise with the earth and with other creatures.

First, that God is speaking with the angels, Luther offers five points of rebuttal.

But I for my part ask: Why did He not also do this previously? In the second place: What concern is the creation of man to the angels? In the third place: He does not mention the angels but simply says: “We.” Therefore He is speaking of makers and creators. This certainly cannot be said of the angels.

In the fourth place, this is also sure: that it cannot be said in any way that we were created according to the image of the angels. In the fifth place, here both appear: “Let Us make” and “He made,” in the plural and in the singular; thereby Moses clearly and forcibly shows us that within and in the very Godhead and the Creating Essence there is one inseparable and eternal plurality. This not even the gates of hell (Matt. 16:18) can take from us.

Second, regarding the idea that the Lord is speaking to the earth, Luther argues

Next, when the Jews say that God is speaking with the earth concerning the earth, this is also worthless. For the earth is not our maker.

This also applies to the idea that the Lord was speaking to other creatures or parts of creation.

Moreover, why didn’t He rather speak to the sun, since Aristotle says: “Man and the sun bring man into existence.” But this does not fit either, because we were not made according to the image of the earth; but we were made according to the image of those Makers who say “Let Us make.” These Makers are three separate Persons in one divine essence. Of these three Persons we are the image, as we shall hear later.

Finally, another objection is offered, namely that to say “We” and “us” is a custom of royalty, and does not indicate plurality. Luther repsonds

It is utterly ridiculous when the Jews say that God is following the custom of princes, who, to indicate respect, speak of themselves in the plural number. The Holy Spirit is not imitating this court mannerism (to give it this name); nor does Holy Scripture sanction this manner of speech.

The conclusion, then, is a bold and comforting doctrine of the Holy Trinity. We rejoice in the “Let us make,” knowing that our first parents were created in the image and likeness of God.

Consequently, this is a sure indication of the Trinity, that in one divine essence there are three Persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Not even so far as Their activity is concerned, therefore, is God separated, because all three Persons here co-operate and say: “Let Us make.” The Father does not make one man and the Son another, nor the Son one man and the Holy Spirit another; but the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, one and the same God, is the Author and Creator of the same work.

The quotations may be found here: Martin Luther, Luther’s Works, Vol. 1: Lectures on Genesis: Chapters 1-5, ed. Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald, and Helmut T. Lehmann, vol. 1 (Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1999), 57–58. Order from CPH. Or you can read an older translation of the Genesis commentary online here.

Teaching the Conscience to the Youth, A Survey

This essay was prepared for the Doxology Collegium, and was published in the second volume of Seelsorger, A Journal of Pastoral Care. -BW

 

The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith.

-1 Timothy 1:5

 

My Everything Hurts, an Introduction

I remember a time when one of my boys was getting after his brother. “Don’t do that,” I said, “You’ve hurt your brother.” I hardly finished saying the words, and he burst into tears, the kind of cry that happens when you slam your fingers in the door. I panicked and thought he was physically injured. “Are you okay? What hurts?” “Everything” was his answer, and I realized what happened. “Come here,” I grabbed him and put him in my lap, “that’s your conscience that hurts.” This was a new conversation for me and my children, and very helpful.

It was helpful, first, to know what to call that thing inside of us that hurts when we do something wrong. It was further helpful to consider together how it worked, why it mattered, how it is a helpful tool from God to guide and guard us. I began to pay closer attention to the conscience in the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions (where they have a central place), and I found that any insight was almost immediately helpful to my children and the youth of the church, and this has also proven true when I’ve been able to present to youth in small and large groups outside the church. Whenever I’ve taught about the conscience people’s attention is perked, even teenagers, and it seems to me that the Biblical teaching of the conscience is a missing piece they need to answer some of the puzzles of their own lives.

We are all wrestling with that inner voice, but many people don’t know what it is called, and most people don’t know why it is there. The state of our conscience determines the state of our lives and every part of it. A bad conscience destroys, but a good, clean, and free conscience brings forth life and truth.

In this essay I would like to outline a Biblical understanding of the conscience to help pastors teach the youth of the church. The information should translate without any difficulty into all areas of pastoral ministry and the Christian life.

 

Part 1: Three Pictures of the Conscience

Pictures and images are great teaching tools. Not only do they involve the imagination in learning, they also provide material for meditation, something for the mind to latch on.

What follows are three pictures of the conscience. They increase in complexity, and each one captures some of the unique aspects of the conscience. The three pictures are: a home-plate umpire, a dirty or clean window, and a courtroom.

 

The First Picture: A Home Plate Umpire

The home plate umpire’s job is to squat behind the catcher and judge the pitches. He doesn’t touch the ball or interact with the players. His job is to judge. If the pitch is in the strike-zone he is supposed to call it a strike; it the pitch is out of the zone he calls it a ball.

So our conscience is observing all the thing0s that are happening around us and inside us: our actions, our words, our thoughts, the things other people say and do to us and to each other, and it makes a judgment. “That was good. That was bad. That was mean. That was kind.” There is a lightness and joy when our conscience judges something we’ve done to be good, and there is guilt when our conscience judges us to be in the wrong.

The conscience is one of God’s gifts to us. It uses His law written on our hearts to help us know and do His will. The conscience serves as a kind of “moral compass”, letting us know if we are facing the right direction. But the important thing about the umpire image is this: the umpire can get it wrong. He will sometimes call a ball a strike or a strike a ball, and this is also true of our conscience. It will sometimes call good evil or evil good. It will be confused, hardened, or just plain wrong. Our conscience is not infallible, but is, in fact, part of our fallen nature, so it must be informed by God’s Word.

I remember talking to a couple who wanted to get married. They had been living together for years. “Do you remember when you first moved in together,” I asked them, “and you knew it was wrong, and you felt bad about it?” “Yes” they both said. “Do you feel bad about it now?” “No” they responded. “What changed?” I asked. They didn’t know, so I told them, “You’ve broken your consciences.” The umpire was blind. The 6th Commandment still says you shall not commit adultery, but their conscience had been overturned and now its objections where unheard whispers.

The Scripture text of this picture is Romans 2:14-15: “For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them…” The conscience is in the accusing and excusing business. A broken conscience has stopped accusing and only excuses.

We will consider later how the Lord keeps the conscience up and running, but with this first image it is enough to know that the conscience makes judgments, and that it is possible for the conscience to make wrong judgments.

 

The Second Picture: A Dirty or Clean Window

This second image of the conscience comes from Dr. John Kleinig, who compares the conscience to a window. When the window is dirty then everything looks dirty, the window itself, everything outside, and even everything inside looks bad because of the bad light. The same is true with an unclean conscience. Everything is a mess. God and all creation are bent toward my destruction. The unclean conscience is often a fearful conscience “put to flight by the sound of a rustling leaf” (Leviticus 26:36, one of Martin Luther’s favorite pictures of a troubled conscience). Everything in this world is an omen, the bad things are signs of God’s judgment, and the good things are tricks. An unclean conscience steals away joy, tempts us with obsessions and distractions, and always clamors for something to calm it down.

On the other hand, a clean window does not result in everything outside and inside looking clean. With a clean window you see things how they are, the clean things look clean, dirty things look dirty. A clean window means you see a thing how it really is, and this is true of a clean conscience. When we have a clean conscience we see ourselves as we are, our neighbor as they are, and God as He is. We are walking in the light of the truth, and we are free. We call good “good” and evil “evil”. We see sin, especially our own, and we recognize it as such. And we see Jesus, the forgiver and Savior of sinners.

The Scripture for this picture of the conscience is Titus 1:15, “To the pure, all things are pure, but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their minds and their consciences are defiled.”

As a window gets dirty it also begins to work like a mirror. You try to look through it but only see a distorted picture of yourself. A dirty conscience will see its own sin and shame everywhere it looks. The accusing voice of the law haunts the dirty conscience like a ghost, whispering behind every corner and scowling in every face.

This picture of the conscience as a window helps us begin to assess our own conscience, and know the difference between a clean and unclean conscience. We will talk extensively about how to come to a clean conscience, but with this picture is it helpful to know that the only thing that can cleanse our conscience is the blood of Jesus. When we try to clean our own conscience with our own works it is like washing the window with mud; it only makes things worse.

 

The Third Picture: A Courtroom

The third picture of the conscience is the most accurate, the most helpful, and the most complicated. In fact, this is more than a picture. The conscience is a courtroom where legal judgments are handed out.

In a court you have a judge, a law, an accused, an accuser, and a defense attorney. If things are working like they should be in your conscience, then God is the judge, the Commandments are the Law, you are the accused, the devil is the accuser, and Jesus and the Holy Spirit are your defense team. That’s a good conscience. You enter the court, plead guilty as charged, and Jesus rushes to your side with the evidence of His blood, His death and resurrection, His sacrifice, and you are declared righteous by God.

But there are a thousand ways that this court can be distorted. Instead of God on the throne I put myself there, and bring in my friends and enemies in to offer judgment. I can try to change the Law, the rules of the court, replacing God’s Law with some sort of new cause or standard of righteousness. Sometimes the law is changed for us, and instead of hearing God’s judgment I can try to be my own defense, and offer up my good works as evidence of my righteousness (self-justification) or my sufferings as evidence of sentence served (self-atonement). Self-justification is the distortion of the conscience through pride. Self-atonement is the distortion of the conscience through despair. All of this is based on the fundamental error that “a conscience can be made good by good works.” This is utterly false, but it is a profoundly difficult error to resist. If I go into the court and plead innocent then everything changes: Jesus is my accuser, the Devil is my defense, and the verdict is condemnation.

The best text for this picture of the courtroom of the conscience is Revelation 12, the vision of the war in heaven. It just so happens that a courtroom is not only the best way to imagine the conscience, but also the best way to imagine heaven, and this, also, is not a picture. Heaven is a courtroom where petitions are heard and judgments are made. The throne of God so famous in the Psalms is the throne of judgment, the seat in a court.

Revelation 12 describes the heavenly throne room and events that unfold there after the Ascension of Jesus. We know from other visions of this court (Job 1 and 2, Zechariah 3) that Satan has a place there. The title “Satan” indicates this office, the work of “accusing the brethren day and night.” But into this throne comes Jesus with His blood, the fruit of His sacrifice, the “It is finished” of the cross, and now there is no room for the devil. What is there to accuse? After the death of Jesus there is no work left for the devil. A war breaks out for Satan’s chair in heaven, and Michael leads the angels against Satan and his demons, and Michael wins; the devil is removed, they “overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and the Word of the testimony” (Revelation 12:11). What joy!

But this is a description of the heavenly court, what does it have to do with our conscience? It so happens that God has designed our conscience as an outpost of the heavenly court. (There is, I’m sure, a better way to describe this, which I am looking for. “Reflection” or “mirror” of the heavenly court doesn’t quite capture the institutidedness of the conscience. “Type”, understood Biblically, might get closer to the idea.) Our conscience is intended to be a shadow of the heavenly reality.

The word paraklete helps us see this. The word is forensic, the defense attorney in the court. Jesus is the Paraklete in heaven. “But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate [paraklete] with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous” (1 John 2:1). Jesus, at the Father’s right hand, is interceding, pleading our case. And, Jesus gives this title to the Holy Spirit sent to us (See John 14:16, 26, 15:26, and 16:7). We do not simply have an Advocate in the heavenly court. We have an Advocate in our heart, in the courtroom of our conscience.

The devil has no place in heaven, so he comes to our conscience to accuse us. We will talk more about the devil’s strategy with the conscience in part 3, but we consider here how the devil works to overthrow the courtroom of the conscience, but we have the Holy Spirit, who makes the heavenly verdict of our justification heard in the conscience.

 

Part 2: Teaching Lists Regarding the Conscience

Second to images, lists are particularly helpful teaching tools. A list helps the mind keep things ordered, and there is especially some sort of strange benefit to knowing that there is an end to something. “There are 12 sons of Jacob” is much easier for the mind to grab onto than “there are a lot of sons of Jacob.”

Here, then, are offered three lists about the conscience that I have found helpful, 1. The four things your conscience knows, 2. The four things that inform the conscience, 3. The four ways the conscience can be bad, and 4. The Three Walls that Protect the Conscience. I’ve also appended to the section a short discussion on the distinction between a troubled conscience and a terrified conscience. These lists will build on the pictures of the conscience from part 1, and will be referred to in part 3.

 

The Four Things Your Conscience Knows

Our conscience makes judgments, but what does it judge? Here is the list:

  1. Your sins
  2. Other’s sins against you
  3. Other’s sins against others
  4. There is something wrong in the world

We know that the conscience is supposed to judge our ourselves, but it doesn’t stop there. The conscience will judge just about anything, but this is the tricky part, it is often very difficult to sort out the thing being judged; every judgment feels something like guilt. It is helpful, then, to distinguish between these four things the conscience knows.

Your sins. This is what your conscience is designed to judge, and the resulting pain brought to us by our conscience we call guilt. Now, we are certainly guilty before we feel guilty. A conscience that is functioning as the Lord designed it is bringing our objective guilt to our feeling and knowing (subjective guilt).

This guilt should drive us to repentance and its fruits. We should repent of our sin and believe the promise that our sins are forgiven. The conscience also plays a role in the fruit of repentance, love for God and the neighbor, warning me against sin and pushing me to live uprightly before my neighbor. This is the Christian response to guilt.

The devil, on the other hand, would push us away from repentance, and have us manage our guilt with other mechanisms. Every false religion and ideology can be understood as guilt-management without repentance, and the result is normally a hardened conscience and/or a conscience appeased with false comfort.

Other’s sins against you. We casually call the guilt of being sinned against “shame.” When I am the object of sin my conscience knows it, but shame is often indistinguishable from guilt; they feel the same.

The Bible often speaks of shame in connection with nakedness (remember Adam and Eve in the Garden, Noah after the flood, and the letter of Jesus to the Church in Laodicea, Revelation 3:18, “that you may be clothed, that the shame of your nakedness my not be revealed…” etc.). Shame, then, is covered by the Lord’s kindness. When a person is sinned against, they are often feeling guilt as they wrestle with shame. Guilt is the testimony in the conscience that we have done wrong. Shame is the testimony in the conscience that there is something wrong with us. An essay could be devoted to the topic of pastoral care to the shamed; it is simply noted here that the pastor of Law and Gospel will bring the Gospel to bear, even on the sin committed against a Christian.

While we often have a hardened conscience to our own sins, we are particularly sensitive to other people’s sins against us. I might gossip and talk bad about people all day, but if I hear a whisper that someone is thinking poorly of me, I am violently offended. We most often judge ourselves with a much more relaxed standard than we use to judge others. (This is not always the case; some people are much more critical of themselves than others. This is good insofar as their conscience is always hearing the Gospel.) Jesus speaks of this in the Sermon on the Mount when He implores us to take the log out of our own eye so that we might judge with clarity the speck in our neighbors’ eyes (Matthew 7:1-5).

The comparative sensitivity of our conscience is especially helpful when teaching about the conscience, and teaching to activate the conscience. The most hardened conscience will remain aware of the sin committed against it. We also note that a healthy conscience will be particularly sensitive to its own sin and guilt, but very slow to anger and quick to forgive the sins that other commit against us.

Others sins against others.

I remember teaching a confirmation class about abortion. The students were appalled. “There are people who kill babies?” “Yes” “In the United States?” “Yes, even in Denver.” The students were shocked; they couldn’t believe it. “What can we do about it?” The consciences of the students were on fire; they were feeling the pain of abortion, the pain of one neighbor sinning against another. And I realized how hardened my own conscience had become to this sin of neighbor against neighbor.

When Isaiah sees God on the throne his conscience is troubled both with his own sin as well as the sin of his neighbors. “I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips” (Isaiah 6:5).

There is something wrong in the world. The last thing the conscience knows it that there is something wrong in the world. Disasters, tragedies, difficulties in the world all register as pain in the conscience.

For most of us, the conscience is not a precise instrument. Like our stomach tells us that we are hungry, but doesn’t tell us if we need a potato or a Twinkie, so our conscience tells us the we need comfort, but it doesn’t tell us how to get that comfort. This, again, is the origin of all the false religions and ideologies in the world, they all offer false comfort to the conscience.

 

Four things that Inform the Conscience

We normally think of the conscience as a self-contained system, but the opposite is the case. The conscience is extremely sensitive to its surroundings. There are four things that inform the conscience.

  1. God’s law (both natural law and God’s revealed law, the Ten Commandments)
  2. Man’s law
  3. Culture (history, tradition, art, popular culture, etc.)
  4. Peers (friends, family, every different shape of neighbor)

God’s law should be the highest thing that informs the conscience of all people. Alas, this is not the case.

Man’s law also informs our conscience. This is why driving the speed limit and driving three miles an hour over the speed limit are two very different things. You can judge the state of your conscience according to man’s law when you see a police man. If your heart skips a beat and you quick look to the speedometer, you know your conscience is in a bad place. If you see the police man and are comforted that someone is there looking out for your safety then your conscience is in a good place, at least according to the speed limit.

Culture also informs the conscience. Art, popular culture, the language used in everyday conversation all inform our conscience. We see this especially as our culture coarsens, our conscience is hardened to sexual sin.

The Bible captures the danger of the culture on our conscience when it calls it “the world.” “Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever” (1 John 3:15-17).

Our peers are the most profound influence on our conscience. Paul warns us, “Bad company ruins good morals,” (1 Corinthians 15:33). Our conscience is so sensitive to the influence of our peers that is can shift from one moment to the next. In fact, the family is almost always the best peer group for the conscience, and the shift of the peer group from the family to friends is the defining difficulty of adolescence. (More on this in section 3.)

These four informers of the conscience can either help or hurt your conscience. In a Christian home and culture, with Christian peers and God’s law, the conscience is acutely aware of God’s law and our sin. On the other hand, in a godless culture and pagan friends, our conscience is hardened and calloused to our sin.

We see, as an example, how the campaign to normalize homosexuality has been fought on these four fronts. Regarding God’s law, the Scriptures regarding homosexuality are dismissed with the clichés like, “Wearing two different types of clothing is also an abomination.” Regarding man’s law, the recent Supreme Court Case legalizing homosexual “marriage”, man’s law has been changed to “protect” the bad conscience. Regarding culture, the attempts to normalize homosexual relationships can be easily sketched in the popular culture. Regarding peers, one of the most profound marks of those tempted by homosexuality is the draw of the “homosexual culture” where one’s peers share the same temptation.

 

Four Ways the Conscience Can Be Bad (and a Fifth)

  1. No guilt over sin (hardened conscience)
  2. Guilt over no sin (violation, abuse, shame)
  3. False Comfort (self-justification)
  4. Guilt over sin (functioning but lacking the Gospel, an “unclean conscience”)
  5. No Functioning Conscience at all

Remembering that our conscience can be wrong, this list is a reflection on the different ways a conscience can be bad.

No guilt over sin is a hardened conscience. The Bible calls this a “seared” (1 Timothy 4:2) and “calloused” (Ephesians 4:19) conscience. Often times the conscience is hardened through habitual sin and addictions. Anger is an instantaneous hardening of the conscience towards a particular person. Drunkenness and any altered state of consciousness through drug use also hardens the conscience. This, I believe, accounts for the devil’s constant temptation to young people to get drunk: their otherwise youthfully tender conscience is hardened.

Knowing this also helps us teach the youth of the church about the sin of drunkenness. I remember learning that getting drunk was a sin against the 5th Commandment, it wasn’t good for your body. That is terrible. Drunkenness is an instant hardening of the conscience which unleashes the flesh. If your flesh has a tendency towards 5th Commandment sins and violence, then this will manifest itself when you are drunk. If your flesh has a tendency towards 6th Commandment sins and lust, then this will come out when you are drunk, and so forth. Drunkenness tears down the walls of the conscience that hold us back from various sins against God and our neighbor.

The response to the conscience that is broken such that it does not feel guilt over their sin is (in most cases) the preaching of the law.

Remember the couple who had moved in together without the blessing of marriage. I asked them, “Do you remember when you first moved in and you were troubled by it?” “Yes.” “Are you troubled with it now?” “No.” “Well,” I told them, “You’ve broken your conscience.” They were somewhat troubled. “You can’t trust it, so you have to trust the Lord’s word which says, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ That is true even when it doesn’t feel true.” The Law of God remains even when the conscience is unable to feel and judge properly.

Guilt over no sin, which is often the result of violation or abuse, and results in shame. We discussed this above under the category of sins committed against us.

We Luther pastors very often speak of guilt, the sins that we commit against God and neighbor. We are sinners, died for by Jesus, and this is the good news of the Gospel. But what about the sins committed against us? What about the shame of being abused? When these things are not taught and preached we leave the door open to the therapeutic victim of popular culture. Our culture tempts us to be defined as victims of various neurosis. I am how I am because of all the things that have happened to me.

The Bible assumes that the Christian has enemies. It is especially impossible to read the Psalms if we miss this assumption, and Jesus emphasizes this point, especially in the Sermon on the Mount. “When your enemy…” Jesus says, not “if you have any enemy.” My enemy is my neighbor who is set on my destruction, and if I live a life surrounded by enemies, then I certainly live a life of being sinned against.

Our conscience wants to interpret being sinned against as guilt. This is especially true with sexual abuse. One often hears stories of women who have been abused spending hours in the shower trying to wash away the uncleanness, or abused children who stop talking. The sins committed against are true and painful violations, and they all manifest in the conscience in various different ways, but we notice two distinct paths down which the devil tempts us, and, as usual, he is pushing us to pride and despair.

The path of pride is the path of anger. When I am angry at someone I have justified a lovelessness toward them; my conscience is hardened toward that person. I am the judge, and I have passed the sentence that they are guilty, and now I will visit them with my wrath. Among us this wrath is often internalized as bitterness, and is most clearly seen when people stop talking to one another. “Leave room for [God’s] wrath,” is Paul’s apostolic command, meditating on the instructions of Moses, “’Vengeance is mine,’ says the Lord” (Romans 12:19, Deuteronomy 32:35).

The second track of shame is despair. The devil tempts us to retreat into ourselves, to think that we deserved the sin committed against us, and that we are worthless and unlovable, “damaged goods.” This despair is a distortion of good and evil, and is a clouding of the conscience.

Both paths result in a bad conscience, and both stop our ears from hearing the Gospel. Anger wants justice and vengeance, not forgiveness, and despair can’t believe that anyone could love me, especially God. A bad conscience is always a conscience bent away from the Gospel, and this is especially seen with the conscience distorted through shame.

There is plenty of Biblical instruction for the sinned-against, most especially the four-fold command of Jesus to “love, bless, do good, and pray.” “But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust” (Matthew 5:44-45, NKJV). This text deserves a much fuller treatment, but even more important than these instructions are the Lord’s promises, and in this case, the promise that even the sins committed against us are forgiven. John says, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).

This is often a difficult word to speak, that the sin that has hurt us and wounded us so profoundly is died for by Jesus, but this is the truth that sets us free. Vengeance is the Lord’s business that He keeps to Himself. Mercy is His business that He shares with us (“Be merciful as your Father is merciful” (Luke 18:39)).

For the sinned-against tempted with despair, the Gospel rings clear with texts about the Lord’s affection, the great news that not only does God love us, He even likes us. The benediction which gives us the blessing of God’s shining and smiling face is a warm and comforting text. The promises of the robe of Christ’s righteousness that covers our sin is a delight. Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, God’s gracious receiving of us into His righteousness and holiness are a beautiful comfort for those tempted by the devil to think that they are “far off” and alienated from God and His people.

False Comfort is a conscience that has managed to find some comfort apart from the Gospel. This is the deceived conscience practicing self-justification, normally through some good-work-doing.

The fundamental doctrine of our sinful flesh is this lie: If God is mad at me because of my sin, then He will be happy with me because of my good works. The old theologians named this doctrine the opinio legis, and it can be seen by asking the standard unbeliever if they think they will god to heaven. “Of course,” they say, “I’m a good person.” This is a deceived conscience abiding in the false comfort of our good works.

The falsely comforted conscience is at the root of every idolatry and ideology, every false religion, false god and false Gospel. It is the “peace” that the world gives, a false peace that ends with destruction. It is the “peace” which Jesus talks about in the parable of the stronger man, “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace” (Luke 11:21, NKJV). The “strong man” that Jesus is talking about is the devil, and his “goods” are the unbelievers. They are at “peace”, that is, they abide in the false comfort of their goodness. This “peace” and false comfort is broken by the preaching of the law. The pride of the falsely comforted conscience is the target of the hammer of God’s law (Jeremiah 23:29).

“Have you ever told a lie? Have you ever taken something that did not belong to you? Have you ever looked at another person with lust? Have you ever talked behind someone’s back? Have you ever been angry with someone and called them a fool? Have you ever used the Lord’s name in vain? Have you ever loved something more than God? Have you ever disobeyed your parents?” The law is the mirror that shatters the delusion of our self-righteousness and shows us to the be the lying, thieving, adulterous, murdering, back-biting, blasphemous, idolatrous rebels that we are. Sinners deserving of God’s wrath.

Contrition is the not only the first part of repentance, it is the first work of a functioning conscience. (In fact, the conscience with where the Lord works repentance, contrition and faith.)

Guilt over sin is the fourth way a conscience can be bad, but this needs explanation. The first three things on this list describe a broken conscience, a conscience that is not functioning as it should. A conscience that is guilty because of our sin is a working and functioning conscience.

I used to have a van with a broken speedometer. I loved it. Most of the time it didn’t work at all; it told me I wasn’t moving even when I was speeding down the highway. This is like a calloused conscience that does not register our guilt. Sometimes this speedometer would work, but it would tell me I was going 5 or 10 miles per hour under my actual speed. This is like the conscience with a false comfort, I was speeding, but I didn’t know it. Sometimes the speedometer would tell me my true speed, and often that would indicate that I was speeding. If the speedometer tells me I’m speeding along at 20 miles per hour over the speed limit, it’s a “bad speedometer” not because it is not working, but precisely because it is working. The same is true with the conscience that knows our guilt because of our sins. It is working, and it is warning us, troubling us.

The guilty conscience is the conscience in need of the Gospel, the promise of God’s kindness in Christ. While the devil would tempt the guilty conscience in every different direction, the one thing needed is the blood of Jesus, the forgiveness of sins, the absolution. “The Lord has put away your sins.” “Neither do I condemn you.” “Christ died for sinners.” The Gospel is the only true comfort for terrified consciences, and it is a comfort indeed.

 

Three Walls to Protect the Conscience (and Why Going Off to College is so Difficult)

A last list will be mentioned briefly here. The three estates can be understood as three walls that (should) protect the conscience:

  1. The Family
  2. The State
  3. The Church

While it is especially helpful for the youth to understand the three estates on their way to understanding this world as an orderly place and the doctrine of vocation, it is also helpful to reflect on the three estates as a help or hindrance to the conscience.

The family is intended by the Lord to be the most immediate context of our lives, and thus it exercises the most influence on or conscience. In most cases the family is the best context for a healthy conscience, and moving out of the home brings an enormous amount of pressure on the conscience because the protection of the family is removed. (More on this in the next section.)

Some families are not helpful for the conscience, and the more disorder and sin rule in a home, the less help the family provides to the conscience.

The State is also intended by God as a help and aid to the conscience. The law is an external and objective standard that informs the conscience. It curbs the flesh and helps us see our sin. When, on the other hand, the State’s law conflict with God’s law then what is intended by God to protect the conscience begins, in fact, to assault it. When the State calls evil good then this false “good” is brought to the conscience as evidence of our own righteousness. We especially see this in the discussions of abortion and homosexual marriage and the new morality these distorted laws define.

The Church is also intended by God as a wall to protect the conscience, both by the preaching of the law (which instructs and calibrates the conscience) and the preaching of the Gospel (which comforts the conscience). When the Lutheran reformers set out to restore the preaching of the Gospel in the church they especially had this in mind, the comfort of terrified consciences.

When talking to the youth about being mindful of their conscience, it is helpful to teach them that the Lord has established the three estates of the Family, the State, and the Church to protect (among other things) the conscience, and that among the devil’s first temptations will be to remove them from the protection of the Family and the Church. This also helps account for the difficult of leaving the home to go to college or serve in the military. The conscience is exposed like never before, and the devil set on it to bend it away from the protection of the law and the comfort of the Gospel.

Like a city protected by three walls, the conscience is protected in an ordered state, a devout family, and an orthodox church. When one of the walls crumbles, the conscience is at a greater risk. If all three walls are fallen, then the conscience is exposed, fighting for its life in the wilderness.

 

Troubled vs Terrified Conscience, An Aside for a Helpful Distinction

Before we move away from our lists, I’ve found it helpful to distinguish between a troubled conscience and a terrified conscience.[1] Here are the definitions:

A troubled conscience knows that it has done something wrong.

A terrified conscience knows that it has offended God’s holiness.

The chief distinction is that the terrified conscience sees the wrong thing that it has done in the context of God’s holiness. An unbeliever can have a troubled conscience. Almost everyone has a sense that they are not perfect and have made mistakes. The Christian knows that their “mistakes” are sins, and that their sins are offensive to God. The cry of the trouble conscience is “oops.” The cry of the terrified conscience is “Alas!” “Against You, You only, have I sinned, And done this evil in Your sight— That You may be found just when You speak, And blameless when You judge” (Psalm 51:4).

The troubled conscience thinks its trouble is its mistakes. The terrified conscience knows that its trouble if God Himself. The troubled conscience, therefore, thinks that there is something it can do to make things right. The terrified conscience has come to the end of itself, the end of its pride, and knows that its only hope is in God’s free and undeserved mercy.

Regarding the distinction between Law and Gospel, the troubled conscience is not yet crushed, the terrified conscience is.

 

Part 3: The Conscience as Teaching Tool

A Biblical understand of the conscience is foundational to teach other Biblical doctrines. Repentance, for example, is impossible to understand without and understanding the conscience. The comfort of the Gospel in only rightly understood when we know about the conscience. Justification, sanctification, vocation, and many other Biblical teachings relate to the conscience.

This does not mean that we cannot have the Gospel or the Lord’s comfort without understanding the conscience. We can have a good conscience without knowing what the conscience is, much like we eat food long before we understand digestion. But an understanding of the conscience is crucial to teach and care for the youth of the church.

In this section we will build on the teaching of the conscience articulated above and apply it in ways helpful to the youth. Specifically, we will consider both adolescence and temptation in the context of the conscience.

 

Understanding adolescence in the language of the conscience

Remembering the four things that inform the conscience, God’s Law, man’s law, culture, and peers, and remembering especially that most often our peers are the strongest influence on our conscience, we can understand the difficulties of adolescence as the difficulty of the conscience adjusting to the expanding group of peers. In other words, our conscience is unsettled when we begin having friends outside our home.

I think the easiest way to demonstrate the influence of our peers on our conscience is to consider our language. Ask the youth this question, “Do you talk the same way around your parents as you do around your friends?” They will laugh. The way the youth talk and the words they use with their friends is very different form the way they talk with parents and teachers. And the switch is almost instantaneous. If a parent walks into the group of friends, you can hear and see the change in the conversation in a breath. This is stunning, and shows the sensitivity of our conscience. Parents and teachers sensitize the conscience to the language that is appropriate to use. Friends (generally) harden the conscience to the language they use.

(Pastors will often experience this phenomenon when meeting strangers. Their language will change, along with the jokes they are telling, as soon as they learn you are a pastor. Or, if a pastor is wearing his clerical uniform, confessions will pour out of strangers completely unprovoked. “I know I should go to church.” “I need to pray more.” The person in an office has an instantaneous effect on the conscience.)

The example of language can be expanded to all behavior. We are all on our best behavior when we are with our parents or our children. The family is almost always the best environment for the conscience.

In adolescence or peers expand from our family to include our friends, and this normally means that while our family helps soften our conscience, our friends are helping harden our conscience. This, I believe, is the main difficulty of adolescence.

There is the added difficulty of the youth’s body changing from the body of a child to the body of an adult. This transition brings with it a whole new commandment to break. Sexual temptation rushes on a person like a tsunami, and it is here that the breach is made into the conscience. St. Paul warns us of the profound danger of sexual immorality with these words, “Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body” (1 Corinthians 6:18). Sexual immorality directly, immediately, and profoundly impacts the conscience, and the damage done there is profound.

Our culture is no help. Man’s law, the culture, and often our peers all exhort the virtue of sexual immorality. It is expected that the youth are sexually active, that couples live together before marriage. Virginity is despised. The Christian virtue of chastity is ridiculed, making and already difficult temptation all the more difficult to resist.

The link between sexual sin and leaving the church has often been discussed and seems to be more and more established. That the Lord’s prophets so often link idolatry and adultery should tell us that a lack of chastity and a lack of faith go together. And even when young people do not leave the church, they are burdened with guilt and shame that distorts and confuses the conscience.

Understanding these difficulties in the context of the conscience is very helpful.

First, when teaching the youth, the pastor can teach about the conscience and the influence our peers have over it. Simply recognizing this and knowing how to talk about it is helpful.

Second, having an awareness of our conscience will help in the fight against temptation. The youth love to ask the dangerous question, “What is God’s will for my life?” We can replace this question with the helpful question, “What will give me a good conscience?”

Third, the pastor will be aware, and will help the youth and the families of the congregation be aware of the importance of peer groups. It is important to have Christian friends; friends that are good for your conscience. And, relatedly, it is important to teach the youth about the vocation of friend, and how we should be a help to out neighbor’s conscience. There is a godly peer pressure which we should seek after.

There is a danger that parents react to adolescence by trying to draw their children in tighter. They become bitter that their children have friends, and a battle breaks out between family and friends. Parents have the vocation of teaching their children to be good friends, and to love their neighbors that the Lord has given them. This is an important part of bringing up the children in the fear and admonition of the Lord. Paul has these words of instruction in his Ephesian table of duties: “Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. ‘Honor your father and mother’ (this is the first commandment with a promise), ‘that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land.’ Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:1-4). We also remember how Paul follows up the instruction to the children (“Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord” Colossians 3:20) with this instruction to the fathers, “Fathers, do not provoke your children, lest they become discouraged” (Colossians 3:21).

Fourth, regarding the temptations to sexual immorality, we should be very clear about the dangers, but we should also present the positive side of the 6th Commandment as well, that the Christian lives a life of chastity (both before and in marriage).

Finally, the pastor is paying attention to the conscience of the youth of the congregation, even asking the question, “How is your conscience?” “What troubles you?” He is ready with the Gospel, with the absolution, with the kindness of God. The youth of the church are, like the adults, real sinners, and the only hope for sinners is the death and resurrection of Jesus.

 

Understanding temptation in the language of the conscience

The devil tempts us in our heart, that is, in our conscience, and every temptation is away from the Gospel. But the devil uses Law and Gospel, twisted, to fit his purposes.

Before we sin the devil preaches a kind of Gospel, “Don’t worry about it, Jesus won’t be mad.” This absolution before the sin is always the devil’s voice. He turns the Gospel from the forgiveness of sins to an excuses to sin, and this is no Gospel at all.

Then, after we sin, the devil changes his strategy. “Look what you did! You call yourself a Christian? God hates you.” He preaches a distorted law of God’s wrath after sin. Either that, or he sends us back to the same sin. “Look, no one was hurt. Do it again.” The devil loves it when we get into a habit of sin; this speeds up the hardening of our conscience and stores up our guilt.

The devil is always pursuing the hardening of our conscience. This can take (at least) three distinct forms, a general hardening of the conscience, a sin-specific hardening of the conscience, and a person-specific hardening of the conscience.

A general hardening of the conscience occurs through a life of indifference to sin. This process is sped up through drunkenness and the use of drugs. In fact, drunkenness achieves the state of an instant hardening of the conscience, and is often a cover for a deeper pain in the conscience.

The devil loves drunkenness because the calloused conscience opens the heart for attack. The youth, whose consciences have not been around enough to become calloused and hardened, are calcified through drunkenness and drug use.

Sin-specific hardening of the conscience occurs when the devil brings a constant temptation to break a certain commandment. For an example, lets imagine the 5th Commandment. There are various degrees of breaking this commandment, from neglect, anger, bitterness, and mockery, all the way to violence, assault, and murder. All of these are sins against the commandment, but the later are much more extreme than the former. Our conscience is calloused to some degree according to the 5th Commandment. I would feel incredibly guilty if I went and murdered someone, but I wouldn’t feel bad at all if I called someone a fool. It would trouble my conscience to get in a fist fight with a guy, but it doesn’t trouble me so much if I get angry. Somewhere along the line my conscience is calloused. If I sin below that callous it doesn’t trouble me; if I sin about that callous it does.

The devil tempts us on the callouses. He loves to put the sin in front of us that troubles us just a bit, and the committing of this sin hardens our heart a bit more.

This is easy to see with the 3rd Commandment. If we are in the habit of going to church, the first Sunday we miss troubles our conscience, but then we get used to it, and next we miss two Sundays, then a month, and we are not troubled at all.

Remember the couple that moved in together? They felt bad at first, but then their conscience grew calloused, and they could no longer feel the pain of their adultery. This pattern is especially obvious according to the 6th Commandment. One often hears stories of the escalating nature of sexual sin, which begins with pornography and escalates to more debase immorality, fornication, adultery, and even criminal activity. This is a gradual hardening of the conscience.

The devil, then, does not tempt us to commit the most horrendous of sins. He tempts us to commit those sins that are right on the edge of the callouses of our conscience.

Person-specific hardening of the conscience occurs through anger. Anger is like a shot of Novocain to the conscience. If a person sins against me or offends me, and I am angry, then my conscience almost shuts down. I can sin against them and treat them in horrible ways, and not only do I not feel guilt, but I feel good about it. “They don’t deserve my love.”

We know that Jesus has commanded us to love our neighbor, but this person has sinned against me; they are off the neighbor list. The devil brings havoc through this person-specific hardening of the heart, and uses it to tear apart families, marriages, and churches. When the devil has us angry he has an opening to tempt us to sin where we don’t feel the pain in our conscience, and he has us doing his work for him when we justify the sins we commit against the people who have hurt us. The Scripture speaks the most severe condemnation against hatred. “Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him” (1 John 3:15).

The devil knows this, and is constantly working to harden our conscience, but the Holy Spirit is constantly working to tenderize our conscience. It is good for us to know, and especially good for the youth of the church to know, that a tender conscience is a good thing, a thing to be pursued and cultivated.

I fear that this has been lost in the Lutheran Church today, and that a tender conscience is seen as a mark of “pietism”. This is wrong and dangerous. The Holy Spirit is constantly working to tenderize and sensitive our conscience to our own sin. This chiefly occurs through our meditation on the Ten Commandments. In fact, I’m convinced that this is the reason Luther sends us to work singing a hymn of the Ten Commandments, that through this meditation the Holy Spirit would soften and strengthen our conscience, that we would be trained in repentance, that we would know more and more the depth of our sin, and therefore rejoice all the more in the height of the Lord’s love.

This “conscience training” is a life-long process, and it begins with the youth, with having the Ten Commandments carved into our hearts, and knowing their use in repentance, in meditation, and in our vocation.

Just as the devil tempts us toward a hardened conscience, he also tempts us towards false comforts. The oddities and dangers of youth culture can all be understood in the context of the conscience.

The various and extreme subcultures that define youth society for a kind of anti-church and anti-reconciliation, where the family and the church are replaced with the culture of rebellion.

Luther once observed that a lawyer considers a man as a property owner, a doctor considers a man as healthy or sick, and a theologian treats man as a sinner. Our culture treats man as consumer, and this is amplified with the youth. Every message they get from the culture is specially designed to bind up their identity with what they purchase. This is a frenzy of self-actualizing materialism, and it is the worship of the two most popular and dangerous idols: money and self. It turns out that you can serve these two masters, and the result in the conscience is that we come into the world not to serve but to be served.

All of this is the devil’s temptation to a bad conscience. All of it is to bend our hearts away from the Gospel. All of it pressed particularly hard on the youth of the church. And none of it should make us afraid. Jesus is still the Lord seated at God’s right hand, and even though we do not yet see it, He still rules the universe for the sake of His Church.

 

The Goal: A Good, Clean, Comforted, and Free Conscience, A Conclusion

Luther once preached that the conscience is “a small room, there’s only room for one.” Most people have the devil in their conscience. The best have Moses living in their conscience. But a good conscience is the conscience filled with the Holy Spirit, the conscience where Jesus takes up residence with His grace and truth. The good conscience echoes with the voice of Jesus, “I forgive you all your sin.” The clean conscience is washed with the blood of the Lamb. The comforted conscience knows its sin is forgiven sin, died-for, atoned, covered, removed, carried away and forgotten sin.

We are sinners. If we know it or not, if we feel it or not, if our sin registers in our conscience or not. Our sin, our rebellion against God, our death, and our guilt are all very real, and so is our Jesus, His blood, His cross, His empty grave, His promise of forgiveness which gives us a good, holy, clean, and free conscience.

This is the goal of all pastoral work, including our tending to the youth of the church. It is not enough to teach about the conscience. The Lord would deliver to His people a good conscience, and this comes by the preaching of the Gospel. The Lord Jesus would still have the children come to Him, and find in Him their life and salvation, their hope and their peace, because in Jesus our conscience is at peace.

 

Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. 

-Hebrews 10:19-22

Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller
Trinity 8, 2015
Doxology Collegium Essay

[1] Dr. John Kleinig likes to add a third category, the disturbed conscience. While the troubled conscience knows that it has done something wrong, the disturbed conscience feels some of the pain and guilt of sin. I think of it this way. A troubled conscience worries about getting caught. A disturbed conscience is already tasting guilt before they are caught.

A Beautiful Quotation from Athanasius On the Incarnation

We have, then, now stated in part, as far as it was possible, and as ourselves had been able to understand, the reason of His bodily appearing; that it was in the power of none other to turn the corruptible to incorruption, except the Saviour Himself, that had at the beginning also made all things out of nought and that none other could create anew the likeness of God’s image for men, save the Image of the Father; and that none other could render the mortal immortal, save our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is the Very Life ; and that none other could teach men of the Father, and destroy the worship of idols, save the Word, that orders all things and is alone the true Only-begotten Son of the Father. 2. But since it was necessary also that the debt owing from all should be paid again: for, as I have already said , it was owing that all should die, for which special cause, indeed, He came among us: to this intent, after the proofs of His Godhead from His works, He next offered up His sacrifice also on behalf of all, yielding His Temple to death in the stead of all, in order firstly to make men quit and free of their old trespass, and further to show Himself more powerful even than death, displaying His own body incorruptible, as first-fruits of the resurrection of all. 3. And do not be surprised if we frequently repeat the same words on the same subject. For since we are speaking of the counsel of God, therefore we expound the same sense in more than one form, lest we should seem to be leaving anything out, and incur the charge of inadequate treatment: for it is better to submit to the blame of repetition than to leave out anything that ought to be set down. 4. The body, then, as sharing the same nature with all, for it was a human body, though by an unparalleled miracle it was formed of a virgin only, yet being mortal, was to die also, conformably to its peers. But by virtue of the union of the Word with it, it was no longer subject to corruption according to its own nature, but by reason of the Word that had come to dwell in it it was placed out of the reach of corruption. 5. And so it was that two marvels came to pass at once, that the death of all was accomplished in the Lord’s body, and that death and corruption were wholly done away by reason of the Word that was united with it. For there was need of death, and death must needs be suffered on behalf of all, that the debt owing from all might be paid. 6. Whence, as I said before, the Word, since it was not possible for Him to die, as He was immortal, took to Himself a body such as could die, that He might offer it as His own in the stead of all, and as suffering, through His union with it, on behalf of all, Bring to nought Him that had the power of death, that is the devil; and might deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

Good, Bad, or In-Between (A Short Survey of the Doctrine of Man)

This is a re-post of an article I wrote some years ago. You can still find the original at www.hope-aurora.org.

Name that Creed

What is man? All theologies answer this question. Some say man is good; others that man is bad, but most say that there is a mix of good and bad. So well play a theological game (you’re favorite kind, I know). Below are four statements on the teaching of man and the depth of sin, your job is to guess who said it.

  1. Man is responsible for sin because he is endowed with free will; yet he is by nature frail, and the tendency of the mind is to evil: “For the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth” (Gen. viii. 21)
  2. “By his free choice man sinned against God and brought sin into the human race. Through the temptation of Satan man transgressed the command of God, and fell from his original innocence whereby his posterity inherit a nature and an environment inclined toward sin. Therefore, as soon as they are capable of moral action, they become transgressors and are under condemnation. Only the grace of God can bring man into His holy fellowship and enable man to fulfill the creative purpose of God.”
  3. “[Original sin] is a deprivation of original holiness and justice, but human nature has not been totally corrupted: it is wounded in the natural powers proper to it; subject to ignorance, suffering, and the dominion of death; and inclined to sin-an inclination to evil that is called ‘concupiscence.’”
  4. “Nor do I absolve my own self of blame: the human soul is certainly prone to evil, unless my Lord do bestow His Mercy: but surely my Lord is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.”

Before we get to the answers, let’s point out the difficulty of the game: all the answers are the same! The key word in each answer is ‘inclination’. In the first answer: “the tendency of the mind is to evil.” In the second and third: “a nature and an environment inclined toward sin” and “inclined to sin.” And in the last answer: “The human soul is certainly prone to evil.” There is a common theme in all of these teachings, and that is that man is not good, and yet not necessarily evil, but inclined and prone to do evil.

Now for the source of each statement:

  1. The Jewish Encyclopedia
  2. Baptist Faith and Message (2000)
  3. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 405
  4. The Quran 12.53

Stunned? It is an amazing thing that modern Judaism, the Southern Baptist Church, the Roman Catholic Church and the Muslim religion have the same doctrine of man. All of these teach that man is wounded, sick, troubled, but that there is still some degree of freedom and life in the will of man.

I, A Poor, Miserable Sinner

Most people think of themselves as a “pretty good person.” The Scriptures beg to differ. The denial of original sin means that most people live in the delusion of their own freedom, but the Bible teaches that all men are dead in trespasses and sin. How many good people are there? St Paul answers:

It is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.” “Their feet are swift to shed blood; in their paths are ruin and misery, and the way of peace they have not known.” “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God.” [Romans 3:10-19, see also Ephesians 2:1ff]

The Scriptures teach with clarity that man is wicked and unholy, and yet (as we have seen above) this teaching that no one is righteous or holy is almost universally denied. But this makes sense. Our sinfulness is so complete that we are blind to our sinful condition.

Imagine a man who falls off a ladder and breaks his ankle. He is broken and he knows it, he cries out for help from someone else. But imagine again that this man breaks his ankle and his back. Now he doesn’t feel the pain of his injury, and in fact might not even know that he is hurt. “Give me a hand up, I’ll be okay.” So is our fall, we are so badly hurt that we do not even feel the injury; we do not know the depth of our sin.

Martin Luther talked of this trouble, that our sin is so deep that we don’t even feel it:

“This hereditary sin is so deep and horrible a corruption of nature that no reason can understand it, but it must be learned and believed from the revelation of Scriptures, Psalm 51:5; Romans 6:12ff; Exodus 33:3; Genesis 3:7ff.” [Smalcald Articles III.I.3]

What Does it Matter?

Most churches teach that our sin is a tendency, not a death. Does this matter? Yes, in fact the Gospel is at stake.

If the article of Justification is the article upon which the church stands or falls, then the article of original sin is the article upon which justification stands or falls. When we know the depth of our sin then we know the height of God’s love for us. The law shows us the depths to which we have fallen, our complete inability to love, serve and fear God, our complete lack of freedom, and so our utter dependence on Jesus for freedom, life and salvation.

Our Lutheran Confessions comment on this:

But the knowledge of original sin is necessary. For the magnitude of the grace of Christ cannot be understood and no one can heartily long and have a desire for Christ, for the inexpressibly great treasure of divine favor and grace which the Gospel offers, unless our diseases be recognized. As Christ says Matt. 9, 12; Mark 2, 17: They that are whole need not a physician. The entire righteousness of man is mere hypocrisy and abomination before God, unless we acknowledge that our heart is naturally destitute of love, fear, and confidence in God that we are miserable sinners who are in disgrace with God. [Apology to the Augsburg Confession, II.33-34]

 

sinThe depth of our sin puts the “alone” in front of grace, in front of faith, in front of Christ. When we know the depth of our sin then we cry out with full voice to God, “Help!” “Lord, have mercy!” And the Biblical doctrine of our original sin gives us the comfort that Jesus has done all to win our salvation. This is the only comfort for sinners. May God grant us this comfort in life and in death.

INJ, Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller

Older posts
Show Buttons
Hide Buttons