World Wide Wolfmueller

Law and Gospel in Joyful Clarity

Category: Uncategorized (page 1 of 44)

Whether Soldiers, Too, Can Be Saved


In this classic essay, Luther takes up the question of being a Christian and a Soldier. He gives soldiers (and others with vocations of violence) the comfort that their work is, in fact, a good work before God.


30 Day Marriage Devotional

Dear Friends,

Just in time for Valentine’s Day, Around the Word has set up a 30-day marriage email devotional based on Pastor Andrew Richard’s book “Christ and the Church.”

Thanks to Pastor Richard for writing this book, and for the folks at Steadfast Lutherans who helped publish it.

You and your spouse will love it.

Let me know what you think. And please help spread the news.

Lord’s Blessings,

The Quest for Self

“The gift of you is not for you, it is for those around you.”

Pastor Jonathan Fisk on Issues, Etc

Click here to listen to the entire interview:

Issues, Etc. Talk Radio for the Thinking Christian

A Cloud of Witnesses with a Catalogue of Testimonies


Here’s the Catalogue of Testimonies.


ATHANASIUS, On the Arian and Catholic Confession (t. 2, op. p. 579, ed. Colon.): “God was not changed into human flesh or substance, but in Himself glorified the nature which He assumed, so that the human, weak, and mortal flesh and nature advanced to [obtained] divine glory, so as to have all power in heaven and in earth, which it did not have before it was assumed by the Word.”

HILARY, lib. 9 (p. 136): “That thus the man Jesus remained in the glory of God the Father, if the flesh had been united to the glory of the Word, and the assumed flesh possessed the glory of the Word.” (Concrete for abstract.)

BASIL THE GREAT, On the Holy Nativity of Christ (p. 231): “In what manner is the Deity in the flesh? Just as fire in iron, not by transition, but by impartation. For fire does not run out to the iron, but, remaining in its place, imparts to it its own peculiar power, which is not diminished by the impartation, and fills the entire mass that becomes partaker of it.

GREGORY OF NYSSA, quoted by Gelasius and Theodoret, Dialog 2 (t. 2., p. 333): “‘Therefore, being exalted to the right hand of God’ [ Acts 2:33]. Who, then, was exalted? The lowly one or the Highest? But what is lowly if not the human? What else besides the divine is the Highest? But God, being the Highest, does not need to be exalted. Therefore, the apostle says that the human [nature] was exalted, and that it was exalted by becoming Lord and Christ. Therefore, by the words He has made the apostle does not express the premundane [eternal] subsistence of the Lord, but the advancement of that which is low to the Highest, namely, to the right hand of God.”

CYRIL, On the Incarnation, cap. 11 (t. 4, p. 241; t. 5, p. 695): “The Word introduced Himself into that which He was not, in order that the nature of man also might become what it was not, resplendent, by its union, with the grandeur of divine majesty, which has been raised beyond nature rather than that it has cast the unchangeable God beneath [its] nature.”

CHRYSOSTOM, on Heb. 2 (p. 125): “For it is really great and wonderful and full of awe that our flesh should be seated above, and be worshiped by angels and archangels and by the seraphim and cherubim. Reflecting upon this, I am often entranced [seem to be beside myself].”
87] The same on I Cor. 10 (p. 174, t. 6, p. 740, and t. 5, p. 261, ed. Frankf.): “This body, even when lying in the manger, the Magi worshiped, etc.; and they took a long journey; and having come, they worshiped with much fear and trembling.”
88] The same, in Epist. 65 to Leo: “Let us learn to know which nature it is to which the Father said, Share My seat. It is that nature to which it has been said, ‘Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.'”

AMBROSE, lib. 5 De Fide, cap. 6 (tom. 2, p. 109): “You have learned that He can subject all things to Himself undoubtedly according to the operation of Deity. Learn now that He receives, according to His flesh, all things as subjected to Him, as it is written, Eph. 1: According to the flesh, therefore, all things are delivered to Him as subject.”
48] The same, lib. 5, cap. 2 (p.99): “For God does not give to the apostles participation in His seat, but to Christ, according to His humanity, is given participation in the divine seat.”
49] And cap. 6 (p. 108): “In Christ our common [human] nature, according to the flesh, has obtained the prerogative of the heavenly seat.”

AUGUSTINE, Of the Words of the Lord, Discourse 58 (t. 10, p. 217): “If Christ is not God by nature, but a creature, He is neither to be worshiped nor adored as God. But to these things they will reply and say: Why, then, is it that you adore with His divinity His flesh, which you do not deny to be a creature, and are no less devoted to it than to Deity?

LEO, Epist. 23 (fol. 99; Ep. [ 23 and 83 ] 46 and 97, ff. 261 and 317, ed. Lugd., 1700), treating of Eph 1, says: “Let the adversaries of the truth declare when or according to what nature the almighty Father raised His Son above all things, or to what substance [nature] He subjected to all things. For to the Deity, as to the Creator, all things have always been subject. If power was added to Him, if Sublimity was exalted, it was inferior to Him who exalted, and did not have the riches of that nature of whose liberality it stood in need. But a person holding such views Arius receives into his fellowship.”

Should Actors Be Citizens?

Apparently, in ancient Rome, and according to Plato, the answer is “no”.

Here’s the quotation from Augustine’s City of God (II.14):

Related image The laws of the Romans and the speculations of Plato have this resemblance, that the latter pronounces a wholesale condemnation of poetical fictions, while the former restrain the licence of satire, at least so far as men are the objects of it. Plato will not suffer poets even to dwell in his city: the laws of Rome prohibit actors from being enrolled as citizens; and if they had not feared to offend the gods who had asked the services of the players, they would in all likelihood have banished them altogether.




The gospel in the Old Testament, Martin Luther traces the golden thread of the promise of Christ in his preface to the New Testament

Here’s the text:

Now to strengthen this faith, God promised this Gospel and testament in many ways, by the prophets in the Old Testament, as St. Paul says, in Romans 1:1, “I am separated to preach the Gospel of Christ, which He promised before through His prophets in the Holy Scripture, concerning His Son, who was born of the seed of David, etc.”

To indicate some of these places: — He gave the first promise, when He said to the serpent, in Genesis 3:15, “I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; he shall tread on thy head and thou shalt sting his heel.” Christ is the seed of this woman, and He has trodden upon the devil’s head, i.e., sin, death, hell, and all his power, for without this seed, no man can escape sin, death, or hell.

Again, in Genesis 22:18, He promised Abraham, “Through thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.” “Christ is the seed of Abraham,” says St. Paul, in Galatians 3:16, and He has blessed all the world through the Gospel, for where Christ is not, there is still the curse that fell upon Adam and his children when he had sinned, so that all of them together are guilty of sin, death, and hell, and must belong to them.

Against this curse the Gospel blesses all the world by the public announcement, “He that believeth in this seed shall be blessed,” that is, rid of sin and righteous, and shall remain alive and be saved forever; as Christ Himself says, in John 11:26, “He that believeth in me shall never die.”

Again, He made this promise to David, in 2 Samuel 7:12, when He said, “I will raise up thy seed after thee, who shall build a house to my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.” That is the kingdom of Christ, of which the Gospel speaks, an everlasting kingdom, a kingdom of life, salvation, and righteousness, and all those who believe shall enter into it from out of the prison of sin and death.

There are many more such promises of the Gospel in the other prophets also, for example, in Micah 5:2, “And thou,: Bethlehem, Ephratah, though thou art small in comparison with the thousands of Judah, out of thee shall come for me Him who is Lord in Israel”; and again in Hosea 13:14, “I will redeem them from hell and rescue them from death; death, I will be to thee a poison; hell, I will be to thee a pestilence.”

The Gospel, then, is nothing but the preaching about Christ, Son of God and of David, true God and man, who by His death and resurrection has overcome all men’s sin, and death and hell, for us who believe in Him.


More on Luther’s Prefaces to the Books of the Bible here.

The Visit of the Magi: An Excerpt from Edersheim’s “Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah”

Blessed Epiphany!

I come back to Alfred Edersheim’s Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (first edition 1883) over and over again. It is a fantastically helpful volume, and I think every Christian family should have a copy of the text hanging around.

You can also find it for free all over the internet. Here is the link to the CCEL link, optimized for web viewing. Here is the link to Google Books, which lets you see the footnotes a bit easier.

Anyhow, here’s Edersheim’s discussion of the visit of the Magi (the numbers correspond to the notes on the bottom of the page):


(St. Matt. ii. 1-8.)

With the Presentation of the Infant Saviour in the Temple, and His acknowledgment – not indeed by the leaders of Israel, but, characteristically, by the representatives of those earnest men and women who looked for His Advent – the Prologue, if such it may be called, to the third Gospel closes. From whatever source its information was derived – perhaps, as has been suggested, its earlier portion from the Virgin-Mother, the later from Anna; or else both alike from her, who with loving reverence and wonderment treasured it all in her heart – its marvellous details could not have been told with greater simplicity, nor yet with more exquisitely delicate grace.1011 On the other hand, the Prologue to the first Gospel, while omitting these, records other incidents of the infancy of the Saviour. The plan of these narratives, or the sources whence they may originally have been derived, may account for the omissions in either case. At first sight it may seem strange, that the cosmopolitan Gospel by St. Luke should have described what took place in the Temple, and the homage of the Jews, while the Gospel by St. Matthew, which was primarily intended for Hebrews, records only the homage of the Gentiles, and the circumstances which led to the flight into Egypt. But of such seeming contrasts there are not a few in the Gospel-history – discords, which soon resolve themselves into glorious harmony.

The story of the homage to the Infant Saviour by the Magi is told by St. Matthew, in language of which the brevity constitutes the chief difficulty. Even their designation is not free from ambiguity. The term Magi is used in the LXX., by Philo, Josephus, and by profane writers, alike in an evil and, so to speak, in a good sense1012 – in the former case as implying the practice of magical arts;1013 in the latter, as referring to the those Eastern (especially Chaldee) priest-sages, whose researches, in great measure as yet mysterious and unknown to us, seem to have embraced much deep knowledge, though not untinged with superstition. It is to these latter, that the Magi spoken of by St. Matthew must have belonged. Their number – to which, however, no importance attaches – cannot be ascertained.1014 Various suggestions have been made as to the country of ‘the East,’ whence they came. At the period in question the sacerdotal caste of the Medes and Persians was dispersed over various parts of the East,1015 and the presence in those lands of a large Jewish diaspora, through which they might, and probably would, gain knowledge of the great hope of Israel,1016 is sufficiently attested by Jewish history. The oldest opinion traces the Magi – though partially on insufficient grounds1017 – to Arabia. And there is this in favor of it, that not only the closest intercourse existed between Palestine and Arabia, but that from about 120 b.c. to the sixth century of our era, the kings of Yemen professed the Jewish faith.1018 For if, on the one hand, it seems unlikely, that Eastern Magi would spontaneously connect a celestial phenomenon with the birth of a Jewish king, evidence will, on the other hand, be presented to connect the meaning attached to the appearance of ‘the star’ at that particular time with Jewish expectancy of the Messiah. But we are anticipating.

Shortly after the Presentation of the Infant Saviour in the Temple, certain Magi from the East arrived in Jerusalem with strange tidings. They had seen at its ‘rising’1019 a sidereal appearance,1020 which they regarded as betokening the birth of the Messiah King of the Jews, in the sense which at the time attached to that designation. Accordingly, they had come to Jerusalem to pay homage1021 to Him, probably not because they imagined He must be born in the Jewish capital1022 but because they would naturally expect there to obtain authentic information, ‘where’ He might be found. In their simplicity of heart, the Magi addressed themselves in the first place to the official head of the nation. The rumor of such an inquiry, and by such persons, would rapidly spread throughout the city. But it produced on King Herod, and in the capital, a far different impression from the feeling of the Magi.

Unscrupulously cruel as Herod had always proved, even the slightest suspicion of danger to his rule – the bare possibility of the Advent of One, Who had such claims upon the allegiance of Israel, and Who, if acknowledged, would evoke the most intense movement on their part – must have struck terror to his heart. Not that he could believe the tidings, though a dread of their possibility might creep over a nature such as Herod’s; but the bare thought of a Pretender, with such claims, would fill him with suspicion, apprehension, and impotent rage. Nor is it difficult to understand, that the whole city should, although on different grounds, have shared the ‘trouble’ of the king. It was certainly not, as some have suggested, from apprehension of ‘the woes’ which, according to popular notions, were to accompany the Advent of Messiah. Throughout the history of Christ the absence of such ‘woes’ was never made a ground of objection to His Messianic claims; and this, because these ‘woes’ were not associated with the first Advent of the Messiah, but with His final manifestation in power. And between these two periods a more or less long interval was supposed to intervene, during which the Messiah would be ‘hidden,’ either in the literal sense, or perhaps as to His power, or else in both respects.1023 This enables us to understand the question of the disciples, as to the sign of His coming and the end of the world, and the answer of the Master.1024 But the people of Jerusalem had far other reason to fear. They knew only too well the character of Herod, and what the consequences would be to them, or to any one who might be suspected, however unjustly, of sympathy with any claimant to the royal throne of David.1025

Herod took immediate measures, characterised by his usual cunning. He called together all the High-Priests – past and present – and all the learned Rabbis,1026 and, without committing himself as to whether the Messiah was already born, or only expected,1027 simply propounded to them the question of His birthplace. This would show him where Jewish expectancy looked for the appearance of his rival, and thus enable him to watch alike that place and the people generally, while it might possibly bring to light the feelings of the leaders of Israel. At the same time he took care diligently to inquire the precise time, when the sidereal appearance had first attracted the attention of the Magi.1028 This would enable him to judge, how far back he would have to make his own inquiries, since the birth of the Pretender might be made to synchronise with the earliest appearance of the sidereal phenomenon. So long as any one lived, who was born in Bethlehem between the earliest appearance of this ‘star’ and the time of the arrival of the Magi, he was not safe. The subsequent conduct of Herod1029 shows, that the Magi must have told him, that their earliest observation of the sidereal phenomenon had taken place two years before their arrival in Jerusalem.

The assembled authorities of Israel could only return one answer to the question submitted by Herod. As shown by the rendering of the Targum Jonathan, the prediction in Micah v. 2 was at the time universally understood as pointing to Bethlehem, as the birthplace of the Messiah. That such was the general expectation, appears from the Talmud,1030 where, in an imaginary conversation between an Arab and a Jew, Bethlehem is authoritatively named as Messiah’s birthplace. St. Matthew reproduces the prophetic utterance of Micah, exactly as such quotations were popularly made at that time. It will be remembered that, Hebrew being a dead language so far as the people were concerned, the Holy Scriptures were always translated into the popular dialect, the person so doing being designated Methurgeman (dragoman) or interpreter. These renderings, which at the time of St. Matthew were not yet allowed to be written down, formed the precedent for, if not the basis of, our later Targum. In short, at that time each one Targumed for himself, and these Targumim (as our existing one on the Prophets shows) were neither literal versions,1031 nor yet paraphrases, but something between them, a sort of interpreting translation. That, when Targuming, the New Testament writers should in preference make use of such a well-known and widely-spread version as the Translation of the LXX. needs no explanation. That they did not confine themselves to it, but, when it seemed necessary, literally or Targumically rendered a verse, appears from the actual quotations in the New Testament. Such Targuming of the Old Testament was entirely in accordance with the then universal method of setting Holy Scripture before a popular audience. It is needless to remark, that the New Testament writers would Targum as Christians. These remarks apply not only to the case under immediate consideration,1032 but generally to the quotations from the Old Testament in the New.1033

The further conduct of Herod was in keeping with his plans. He sent for the Magi – for various reasons, secretly. After ascertaining the precise time, when they had first observed the ‘star,’ he directed them to Bethlehem, with the request to inform him when they had found the Child; on pretence, that he was equally desirous with them to pay Him homage. As they left Jerusalem 1034 for the goal of their pilgrimage, to their surprise and joy, the ‘star,’ which had attracted their attention at its ‘rising,’1035 and which, as seems implied in the narrative, they had not seen of late, once more appeared on the horizon, and seemed to move before them, till ‘it stood over where the young child was’ – that is, of course, over Bethlehem, not over any special house in it. Whether at a turn of the road, close to Bethlehem, they lost sight of it, or they no longer heeded its position, since it had seemed to go before them to the goal that had been pointed out – for, surely, they needed not the star to guide them to Bethlehem – or whether the celestial phenomenon now disappeared, is neither stated in the Gospel-narrative, nor is indeed of any importance. Sufficient for them, and for us: they had been auhoritatively directed to Bethlehem; as they had set out for it, the sidereal phenomenon had once more appeared; and it had seemed to go before them, till it actually stood over Bethlehem. And, since in ancient times such extraordinary ‘guidance’ by a ‘star’ was matter of belief and expectancy,1036 the Magi would, from their standpoint, regard it as the fullest confirmation that they had been rightly directed to Bethlehem, and ‘they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.’ It could not be difficult to learn in Bethlehem, where the Infant, around Whose Birth marvels had gathered, might be found. It appears that the temporary shelter of the ‘stable’ had been exchanged by the Holy Family for the more permanent abode of a ‘house;’ 1037 and there the Magi found the Infant-Saviour with His Mother. With exquisite tact and reverence the narrative attempts not the faintest description of the scene. It is as if the sacred writer had fully entered into the spirit of St. Paul, ‘Yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we Him no more.’1038 And thus it should ever be. It is the great fact of the manifestation of Christ – not its outward surroundings, however precious or touching they might be in connection with any ordinary earthly being – to which our gaze must be directed. The externals may, indeed, attract our sensuous nature; but they detract from the unmatched glory of the great supersensuous Reality.1039 Around the Person of the God-Man, in the hour when the homage of the heathen world was first offered Him, we need not, and want not, the drapery of outward circumstances. That scene is best realized, not by description, but by silently joining in the silent homage and the silent offerings of ‘the wise men from the East.’

Before proceeding further, we must ask ourselves two questions: What relationship does this narrative bear to Jewish expectancy? and, Is there any astronomical confirmation of this account? Besides their intrinsic interest, the answer to the first question will determine, whether any legendary basis could be assigned to the narrative; while on the second will depend, whether the account can be truthfully charged with an accommodation on the part of God to the superstitions and errors of astrology. For, if the whole was extranatural, and the sidereal appearance specially produced in order to meet the astrological views of the Magi, it would not be a sufficient answer to the difficulty, ‘that great catastrophes and unusual phenomena in nature have synchronized in a remarkable manner with great events in human history.’1040 On the other hand, if the sidereal appearance was not of supernatural origin, and would equally have taken place whether or not there had been Magi to direct to Bethlehem, the difficulty is not only entirely removed, but the narrative affords another instance, alike of the condescension of God to the lower standpoint of the Magi, and of His wisdom and goodness in the combination of circumstances.

As regards the question of Jewish expectancy, sufficient has been said in the preceding pages, to show that Rabbinism looked for a very different kind and manner of the world’s homage to the Messiah than that of a few Magi, guided by a star to His Infant-Home. Indeed, so far from serving as historical basis for the orgin of such a ‘legend’ a more gross caricature of Jewish Messianic anticipation could scarcely be imagined. Similarly futile would it be to seek a background for this narrative in Balaam’s prediction,1041 since it is incredible that any one could have understood it as referring to a brief sidereal apparition to a few Magi, in order to bring them to look for the Messiah.1042 Nor can it be represented as intended to fulfil the prophecy of Isaiah,10431044 that ‘they shall bring gold and incense, and they shall show forth the praises of the Lord.’ For, supposing this figurative language to have been grossly literalised,1045 what would become of the other part of that prophecy,1046 which must, of course, have been treated in the same manner; not to speak of the fact, that the whole evidently refers not to the Messiah (least of all in His Infancy), but to Jerusalem in her latter-day glory. Thus, we fail to perceive any historical basis for a legendary origin of St. Matthew’s narrative, either in the Old Testament or, still less, in Jewish tradition. And we are warranted in asking: If the account be not true, what rational explanation can be given of its origin, since its invention would never have occurred to any contemporary Jew?

But this is not all. There seems, indeed, no logical connection between this astrological interpretation of the Magi, and any supposed practice of astrology among the Jews. Yet, strange to say, writers have largely insisted on this.1047 The charge is, to say the least, grossly exaggerated. That Jewish – as other Eastern – impostors pretended to astrological knowledge, and that such investigations may have been secretly carried on by certain Jewish students, is readily admitted. But the language of disapproval in which these pursuits are referred to – such as that knowledge of the Law is not found with astrologers1048 – and the emphatic statement, that he who learned even one thing from a Mage deserved death, show what views were authoritatively held.10491050 Of course, the Jews (or many of them), like most ancients, believed in the influence of the planets upon the destiny of man.1051 But it was a principle strongly expressed, and frequently illustrated in the Talmud, that such planetary influence did not extend to Israel.1052 It must be admitted, that this was not always consistently carried out; and there were Rabbis who computed a man’s future from the constellation (the Mazzal), either of the day, or the hour, under which he was born.1053 It was supposed, that some persons had a star of their own,1054 and the (representative) stars of all proselytes were said to have been present at Mount Sinai. Accordingly, they also, like Israel, had lost the defilement of the serpent (sin).1055 One Rabbi even had it, that success, wisdom, the duration of life, and a posterity, depended upon the constellation.1056 Such views were carried out till they merged in a kind of fatalism,1057 or else in the idea of a ‘natal affinity,’ by which persons born under the same constellation were thought to stand in sympathetic rapport.1058 The further statement, that conjunctions of the planets1059 affected the products of the earth1060 is scarcely astrological; nor perhaps this, that an eclipse of the sun betokened evil to the nations, an eclipse of the moon to Israel, because the former calculated time by the sun, the latter by the moon.

But there is one illustrative Jewish statement which, though not astrological, is of the greatest importance, although it seems to have been hitherto overlooked. Since the appearance of Münter’s well known tractate on the Star of the Magi,1061 writers have endeavoured to show, that Jewish expectancy of a Messiah was connected with a peculiar sidereal conjunction, such as that which occurred two years before the birth of our Lord,1062 and this on the ground of a quotation from the well-known Jewish commentator Abarbanel (or rather Abrabanel).1063 In his Commentary on Daniel that Rabbi laid it down, that the conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in the constellation Pisces betokened not only the most important events, but referred especially to Israel (for which he gives five mystic reasons). He further argues that, as that conjunction had taken place three years before the birth of Moses, which heralded the first deliverance of Israel, so it would also precede the birth of the Messiah, and the final deliverance of Israel. But the argument fails, not only because Abarbanel’s calculations are inconclusive and even erroneous,1064 but because it is manifestly unfair to infer the state of Jewish belief at the time of Christ from a haphazard astrological conceit of a Rabbi of the fifteenth century. There is, however, testimony which seems to us not only reliable, but embodies most ancient Jewish tradition. It is contained in one of the smaller Midrashim, of which a collection has lately been published.1065 On account of its importance, one quotation at least from it should be made in full. The so-called Messiah-Haggadah (Aggadoth Mashiach) opens as follows: ‘A star shall come out of Jacob. There is a Boraita in the name of the Rabbis: The heptad in which the Son of David cometh – in the first year, there will not be sufficient nourishment; in the second year the arrows of famine are launched; in the third, a great famine; in the fourth, neither famine nor plenty; in the fifth, great abundance, and the Star shall shine forth from the East, and this is the Star of the Messiah. And it will shine from the East for fifteen days, and if it be prolonged, it will be for the good of Israel; in the sixth, sayings (voices), and announcements (hearings); in the seventh, wars, and at the close of the seventh the Messiah is to be expected.’ A similar statement occurs at the close of a collection of three Midrashim – respectively entitled, ‘The Book of Elijah,’ ‘Chapters about the Messiah,’ and ‘The Mysteries of R. Simon, the son of Jochai’1066 – where we read that a Star in the East was to appear two years before the birth of the Messiah. The statement is almost equally remarkable, whether it represents a tradition previous to the birth of Jesus, or originated after that event. But two years before the birth of Christ, which, as we have calculated, took place in December 749 a.u.c., or 5 before the Christian era, brings us to the year 747 a.u.c., or 7 before Christ, in which such a Star should appear in the East.1067

Did such a Star, then, really appear in the East seven years before the Christian era? Astronomically speaking, and without any reference to controversy, there can be no doubt that the most remarkable conjunction of planets – that of Jupiter and Saturn in the constellation of Pices, which occurs only once in 800 years – did take place no less than three times in the year 747 a.u.c., or two years before the birth of Christ (in May, October and December). This conjunction is admitted by all astronomers. It was not only extraordinary, but presented the most brilliant spectacle in the night-sky, such as could not but attract the attention of all who watched the sidereal heavens, but especially of those who busied themselves with astrology. In the year following, that is, in 748 a.u.c., another planet, Mars, joined this conjunction. The merit of first discovering these facts – of which it is unnecessary here to present the literary history1068 – belongs to the great Kepler,1069 who, accordingly, placed the Nativity of Christ in the year 748 a.u.c. This date, however, is not only well nigh impossible; but it has also been shown that such a conjunction would, for various reasons, not answer the requirements of the Evangelical narrative, so far as the guidance to Bethlehem is concerned. But it does fully account for the attention of the Magi being aroused, and – even if they had not possessed knowledge of the Jewish expectancy above described – for their making inquiry of all around, and certainly, among others, of the Jews. Here we leave the domain of the certain, and enter upon that of the probable. Kepler, who was led to the discovery by observing a similar conjunction in 1603-4, also noticed, that when the three planets came into conjunction, a new, extraordinary, brilliant, and peculiarly colored evanescent star was visible between Jupiter and Saturn, and he suggested that a similar star had appeared under the same circumstances in the conjunction preceding the Nativity. Of this, of course, there is not, and cannot be, absolute certainty. But, if so, this would be ‘the star’ of the Magi, ‘in its rising.’ There is yet another remarkable statement, which, however, must also be assigned only to the domain of the probable. In the astronomical tables of the Chinese – to whose general trustworthiness so high an authority as Humboldt bears testimony1070 – the appearance of an evanescent star was noted. Pingre and others have designated it as a comet, and calculated its first appearance in February 750 a.u.c., which is just the time when the Magi would, in all probability, leave Jerusalem for Bethlehem, since this must have preceded the death of Herod, which took place in March 750. Moreover, it has been astronomically ascertained, that such a sidereal apparition would be visible to those who left Jerusalem, and that it would point – almost seem to go before – in the direction of, and stand over, Bethlehem.1071 Such, impartially stated, are the facts of the case – and here the subject must, in the present state of our information, be left.1072

Only two things are recorded of this visit of the Magi to Bethlehem: their humblest Eastern homage, and their offerings.1073 Viewed as gifts, the incense and the myrrh would, indeed, have been strangely inappropriate. But their offerings were evidently intended as specimens of the products of their country, and their presentation was, even as in our own days, expressive of the homage of their country to the new-found King. In this sense, then, the Magi may truly be regarded as the representatives of the Gentile world; their homage as the first and typical acknowledgment of Christ by those who hitherto had been ‘far off;’ and their offerings as symbolic of the world’s tribute. This deeper significance the ancient Church has rightly apprehended, though, perhaps, mistaking its grounds. Its symbolism, twining, like the convolvulus, around the Divine Plant, has traced in the gold the emblem of His Royalty; in the myrrh, of His Humanity, and that in the fullest evidence of it, in His burying; and in the incense, that of His Divinity.1074

As always in the history of Christ, so here also, glory and suffering appear in juxtaposition. It could not be, that these Magi should become the innocent instruments of Herod’s murderous designs; nor yet that the Infant-Saviour should fall a victim to the tyrant. Warned of God in a dream, the ‘wise men’ returned ‘into their own country another way;’ and, warned by the angel of the Lord in a dream, the Holy Family sought temporary shelter in Egypt. Baffled in the hope of attaining his object through the Magi, the reckless tyrant sought to secure it by an indiscriminate slaughter of all the children in Bethlehem and its immediate neighborhood, from two years and under. True, considering the population of Bethlehem, their number could only have been small, probably twenty at most.1075 But the deed was none the less atrocious; and these infants may justly be regarded as the ‘protomartyrs,’ the first witnesses, of Christ, ‘the blossom of martydom’ (‘flores martyrum,’ as Prudentius calls them). The slaughter was entirely in accordance with the character and former measures of Herod.1076 Nor do we wonder, that it remained unrecorded by Josephus, since on other occasions also he has omitted events which to us seem important.1077 The murder of a few infants in an insignificant village might appear scarcely worth notice in a reign stained by so much bloodshed. Besides, he had, perhaps, a special motive for this silence. Josephus always carefully suppresses, so far as possible, all that refers to the Christ1078 – probably not only in accordance with his own religious views, but because mention of a Christ might have been dangerous, certainly would have been inconvenient, in a work written by an intense self-seeker, mainly for readers in Rome.

Of two passages in his own Old Testament Scriptures the Evangelist sees a fulfilment in these events. The flight into Egypt is to him the fulfilment of this expression by Hosea, ‘Out of Egypt have I called My Son.’1079 In the murder of ‘the Innocents,’ he sees the fulfilment of Rachel’s lament1080 (who died and was buried in Ramah)1081 over her children, the men of Benjamin, when the exiles to Babylon met in Ramah,1082 and there was bitter wailing at the prospect of parting for hopeless captivity, and yet bitterer lament, as they who might have encumbered the onward march were pitilessly slaughtered. Those who have attentively followed the course of Jewish thinking, and marked how the ancient Synagogue, and that rightly, read the Old Testament in its unity, as ever pointing to the Messiah as the fulfilment of Israel’s history, will not wonder at, but fully accord with, St. Matthew’s retrospective view. The words of Hosea were in the highest sense ‘fulfilled’ in the flight to, and return of, the Saviour from Egypt.1083 To an inspired writer, nay, to a true Jewish reader of the Old Testament, the question in regard to any prophecy could not be: What did the prophet – but, What did the prophecy – mean? And this could only be unfolded in the course of Israel’s history. Similarly, those who ever saw in the past the prototype of the future, and recognized in events, not only the principle, but the very features, of that which was to come, could not fail to perceive, in the bitter wail of the mothers of Bethlehem over their slaughtered children, the full realisation of the prophetic description of the scene enacted in Jeremiah’s days. Had not the prophet himself heard, in the lament of the captives to Babylon, the echoes of Rachel’s voice in the past? In neither one nor the other case had the utterances of the prophets (Hosea and Jeremiah) been predictions: they were prophetic. In neither one nor the other case was the ‘fulfilment’ literal: it was Scriptural, and that in the truest Old Testament sense.


1011 It is scarcely necessary to point out, how evidential this is of the truthfulness of the Gospel-narrative. In this respect also the so-called Apocryphal Gospels, with their gross and often repulsive legendary adornments, form a striking contrast. I have purposely abstained from reproducing any of these narratives, partly because previous writers have done so, and partly because the only object served by repeating, what must so deeply shock the Christian mind, would be to point the contrast between the canonical and the Apocryphal Gospels. But this can, I think, be as well done by a single sentence, as by pages of quotations.
1012 The evidence on this point is furnished by J. G. Müller in Herzog’s Real-Enc., vol. viii. p. 682. The whole subject of the visit of the Magi is treated with the greatest ability and learning (as against Strauss) by Dr. Mill (‘On the Mythical Interpretation of the Gospels,’ part ii. pp. 275 &c.).
1013 So also in Acts viii. 9; xiii. 6, 8.
1014 They are variously stated as twelve (Aug. Chrysost.) and three, the latter on account of the number of the gifts. Other legends on the subject need not be repeated.
1015 Mill, u. s., p. 303.
1016 There is no historical evidence that at the time of Christ there was among the nations any widespread expectancy of the Advent of a Messiah in Palestine. Where the knowledge of such a hope existed, it must have been entirely derived from Jewish sources. The allusions to it by Tacitus (Hist. v. 13) and Suetonius (Vesp. 4) are evidently derived from Josephus, and admittedly refer to the Flavian dynasty, and to a period seventy years or more after the Advent of Christ. ‘The splendid vaticination in the Fourth Eclogue of Virgil,’ which Archdeacon Farrar regards as among the ‘unconscious prophecies of heathendom,’ is confessedly derived from the Cumaean Sibyl, and based on the Sibylline Oracles, book iii. lines 784-794 (ed. Friedlieb, p. 86; see Einl. p. xxxix.). Almost the whole of book iii., inclusive of these verses, is of Jewish authorship, and dates probably from about 160 b.c. Archdeacon Farrar holds that, besides the above references, ‘there is ample proof, both in Jewish and Pagan writings, that a guilty and weary world was dimly expecting the advent of its Deliverer.’ But he offers no evidence of it, either from Jewish or Pagan writings.
1017 Comp. Mill, u.s., p. 308, note 66. The grounds adduced by some are such references as to Is. viii. 4; Ps. lxxii. 10, &c.; and the character of the gifts.
1018 Comp. the account of this Jewish monarchy in the ‘History of the Jewish Nation,’ pp. 67-71; also Remond’s Vers. e. Gesch. d. Ausbreit. d. Judenth. pp. 81 &c.; and Jost, Gesch. d. Isr. vol. v. pp. 236 &c.
1019 This is the correct rendering, and not, as in A.V., ‘in the East,’ the latter being expressed by the plural of ͺνατολͺ, in v. 1, while in vv. 2 and 9 the word is used in the singular.
1020 Schleusner has abundantly proved that the word ͺστͺρ, though primarily meaning a star, is also used of constellations, meteors, and comets – in short, has the widest application: ‘omne designare, quod aliquem splendorem habet et emitit’ (Lex. in N.T., t. i. pp. 390, 391).
1021 Not, as in the A.V., ‘to worship,’ which at this stage of the history would seem most incongruous, but as an equivalent of the Hebrew {hebrew}, as in Gen. xix. 1. So often in the LXX. and by profane writers (comp. Scheleusner, u. s., t. ii. pp. 749, 750, and Vorstius, De Hebraismis N.T. pp. 637-641).
1022 This is the view generally, but as I think erroneously, entertained. Any Jew would have told them, that the Messiah was not to be born in Jerusalem. Besides, the question of the Magi implies their ignorance of the ‘where’ of the Messiah.
1023 Christian writers on these subjects have generally conjoined the so-called ‘woes of the Messiah’ with His first appearance. It seems not to have occurred to them, that, if such had been the Jewish expectation, a preliminary objection would have lain against the claims of Jesus from their absence.
1024 As reported in St. Matt. xxiv. 3-29.
1025 Their feelings on this matter would be represented, mutatis mutandis, by the expressions in the Sanhedrin, recorded in St. John xi. 47-50.
1026 Both Meyer and Weiss have shown, that this was not a meeting of the Sanhedrin, if, indeed, that body had anything more than a shadowy existence during the reign of Herod.
1027 The question propounded by Herod (v. 4), ‘where Christ should be born,’ is put neither in the past nor in the future, but in the present tense. In other words, he laid before them a case – a theological problem, but not a fact, either past or future.
1028 St. Matt. ii. 7.
1029 v. 16.
1030 Jer. Ber. ii. 4, p. 5 a.
1031 In point of fact, the Talmud expressly lays it down, that ‘whosoever targums a verse in its closely literal form [without due regard to its meaning], is a liar.’ (Kidd. 49 a; comp. on the subject Deutsch’s ‘Literary Remains,’ p. 327).
1032 St. Matt. ii. 6.
1033 The general pinciple, that St. Matthew rendered Mic. v. 2 targumically, would, it seems, cover all the differences between his quotation and the Hebrew text. But it may be worth while, in this instance at least, to examine the differences in detail. Two of them are trivial, viz., ‘Bethlehem, land of Juda,’ instead of ‘Ephratah;’ ‘princes’ instead of ‘thousands,’ though St. Matthew may, possibly, have pointed {hebrew} (‘princes’), instead of {hebrew} as in our Hebrew text. Perhaps he rendered the word more correctly than we do, since {hebrew} means not only a ‘thousand’ but also a part of a tribe (Is. lx. 22), a clan, or Beth Abh (Judg. vi. 15); comp. also Numb. i. 16; x. 4, 36; Deut. xxxiii. 17; Josh. xxii. 21, 30; i Sam. x. 19; xxiii. 23; in which case the personification of these ‘thousands’ (=our ‘hundreds’) by their chieftains or ‘princes’ would be a very apt Targumic rendering. Two other of the divergences are more important, viz., (1) ‘Art not the least,’ instead of ‘though thou be little.’ But the Hebrew words have also been otherwise rendered: in the Syriac interrogatively (‘art thou little?’), which suggests the rendering of St. Matthew; and in the Arabic just as by St. Matthew (vide Pocock, Porta Mosis, Notæ, c. ii.; but Pocock does not give the Targum accurately). Credner ingeniously suggested, that the rendering of St. Matthew may have been caused by a Targumic rendering of the Hebrew {hebrew} by {hebrew}; but he does not seem to have noticed, that this is the actual rendering in the Targum Jon. on the passage. As for the second and more serious divergence in the latter part of the verse, it may be best here simply to give for comparison the rendering of the passage in the Targum Jonathan: ‘Out of thee shall come forth before Me Messiah to exercise rule over Israel.’
1034 Not necessarily by night, as most writers suppose.
1035 So correctly, and not ‘in the East,’ as in A.V.
1036 Proof of this is abundantly furnished by Wetstein, Nov. Test. t. i. pp. 247 and 248.
1037 v. 11.
1038 2 Cor. v 16
1039 In this seems to lie the strongest condemnation of Romish and Romanising tendencies, that they ever seek to present – or, perhaps, rather obtrude – the external circumstances. It is not thus that the Gospel most fully presents to us the spiritual, nor yet thus that the deepest and holiest impressions are made. True religion is ever objectivistic, sensuous subjectivistic.
1040 Archdeacon Farrar.
1041 Numb. xxiv. 17.
1042 Strauss (Leben Jesu, i. pp. 224-249) finds a legendary basis for the Evangelic account in Numb. xxiv. 17, and also appeals to the legendary stories of profane writers about stars appearing at the birth of great men.
1043 lx. 6 last clauses.
1044 Keim (Jesu von Nazara, i. 2, p. 377) drops the appeal to legends of profane writers, ascribes only a secondary influence to Numb. xxiv. 17, and lays the main stress of ‘the legend’ on Is. lx. – with what success the reader may judge.
1045 Can it be imagined thatany person would invent such a ‘legend’ on the strength of Is. lx. 6? On the other hand, if the event really took place, it is easy to understand how Christian symbolism would – though uncritically – have seen an adumbration of it in that prophecy.
1046 The ‘multitude of camels and dromedaries,’ the ‘flocks of Kedar and the rams of Nebaioth’ (v. 7), and ‘the isles,’ and ‘the ships of Tarshish’ (v. 9).
1047 The subject of Jewish astrology is well treated by Dr. Hamburger, both in the first and second volumes of his Real-Encykl. The ablest summary, though brief, is that in Dr. Gideon Brecher’s book, ‘Das Transcendentale im Talmud.’ Gfrörer is, as usually, one-sided, and not always trustworthy in his translations. A curious brochure by Rabbi Thein (Der Talmud, od. das Prinzip d. planet. Elinfl.) is one of the boldest attempts at special pleading, to the ignoration of palpable facts on the other side. Hausrath’s dicta on this subject are, as on many others, assertions unsupported by historical evidence.
1048 Deb. R. 8.
1049 Comp. Shabb. 75 a.
1050 I cannot, however, see that Buxtorf charges so many Rabbis with giving themselves to astrology as Dr. Geikie imputes to him – nor how Humboldt can be quoted as corroborating the Chinese record of the appearance of a new star in 750 (see the passage in the Cosmos, Engl. transl. vol. i. pp. 92, 93).
1051 See for ex. Jos. War vi. 5. 3.
1052 Shabb. 156 a.
1053 Shabb, u. s.
1054 Moed K. 16 a.
1055 Shabb. 145 b; 146 a comp. Yeb. 103 b.
1056 Moed K. 28 a.
1057 Comp. Baba K. 2 b; Shabb. 121 b.
1058 Ned. 39 b.
1059 Jewish astronomy distinguishes the seven planets (called ‘wandering stars’); the twelve signs of the Zodiac, Mazzaloth (Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricornus, Aquarius, Pisces) – arranged by astrologers into four trigons: that of fire (1, 5, 9); of earth (2, 6, 10); of air (3, 7, 11); and of water (4, 8, 12); and the stars. The Kabbalistic book Raziel (dating from the eleventh century) arranges them into three quadrons. The comets, which are called arrows or star-rods, proved a great difficulty to students. The planets (in their order) were: Shabbathai (the Sabbatic, Saturn); Tsedeq (righteousness, Jupiter); Maadim (the red, blood-coloured, Mars); Chammah (the Sun); Nogah (splendour, Venus); Cokhabh (the star, Mercury); Lebhanah (the Moon). Kabbalistic works depict our system as a circle, the lower arc consisting of Oceanos, and the upper filled by the sphere of the earth; next comes that of the surrounding atmosphere; then successively the seven semicircles of the planets, each fitting on the other – to use the Kabbalistic illustration – like the successive layers in an onion (see Sepher Raziel, ed. Lemb. 1873, pp. 9 b, 10 a). Day and night were divided each into twelve hours (from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., and from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.). Each hour was under the influence of successive planets: thus, Sunday, 7 a.m., the Sun; 8 a.m., Venus; 9 a.m., Mercury; 10 a.m., Moon; 11 a.m., Saturn; 12 a.m., Jupiter, and so on. Similarly, we have for Monday, 7 a.m., the Moon, &c.; for Tuesday, 7 a.m., Mars; for Wednesday, 7 a.m., Mercury; for Thursday, 7 a.m., Jupiter; for Friday, 7 a.m., Venus; and for Saturday, 7 a.m., Saturn. Most important were the Tequphoth, in which the Sun entered respectively Aries (Tek. Nisan, spring-equinox, ‘harvest’), Cancer (Tek. Tammuz, summer solstice, ‘warmth’), Libra (Tek. Tishri, autumn-equinox, seed-time), Capricornus (Tek. Tebheth, winter-solstice, ‘cold’). Comp. Targ. Pseudo-Jon. on Gen. viii. 22. From one Tequphah to the other were 91 days 7½ hours. By a beautiful figure the sundust is called ‘filings of the day’ (as the word ξͺσμα – that which falls off from the sunwheel as it turns (Yoma 20 b).
1060 Erub. 56 a: Ber. R. 10.
1061 ‘Der Stern der Weisen,’ Copenhagen, 1827. The tractate, though so frequently quoted, seems scarcely to have been sufficiently studied, most writers having apparently rather read the references to it in Ideler’s Handb. d. Math. u techn. Chronol. Münter’s work contains much that is interesting and important.
1062 In 747 a.u.c., or 7 b.c.
1063 Born 1439 died 1508.
1064 To form an adequate conception of the untrustworthiness of such a testimony, it is necessary to study the history of the astronomical and astrological pursuits of the Jews during that period, of which a masterly summary is given in Steinschneider’s History of Jewish Literature (Ersch u. Gruber, Encykl. vol. xxvii.). Comp. also Sachs, Relig. Poes. d. Juden in Spanien, pp. 230 &c.
1065 By Dr. Jellinek, in a work in six parts, entitled ‘Beth ha-Midrash,’ Leipz, and Vienna, 1853-1878.
1066 Jellinek, Beth ha-Midrash, fasc. iii. p. 8.
1067 It would, of course, be possible to argue, that the Evangelic account arose from this Jewish tradition about the appearance of a star two years before the birth of the Messiah. But ut has been already shown, that the hypothesis of a Jewish legendary origin is utterly untenable. Besides, if St. Matthew ii. had been derived from this tradition, the narrative would have been quite differently shaped, and more especially the two years’ interval between the rising of the star and the Advent of the Messiah would have been emphasized, instead of being, as now, rather matter of inference.
1068 The chief writers on the subject have been: Münter (u.s.), Ideler (u.s.). and Wieseler (Chronol. Synopse d. 4 Evang. (1843), and again in Herzog’s Real-Enc. vol. xxi p. 544, and finally in his Beitr. z. Würd. d Ev. 1869). In our own country, writers have, since the appearance of Professor Pritchard’s art. (‘Star of the Wise Men’) in Dr. Smith’s Bible Dict. vol. iii., generally given up the astronomical argument, without, however, clearly indicating whether they regard the star as a miraculous guidance. I do not, of course, presume to enter on an astronomical discussion with Professor Pritchard; but as his reasoning proceeds on the idea that the planetary conjunction of 747 a.u.c., is regarded as ‘the Star of the Magi,’ his arguments do not apply either to the view presented in the text nor even to that of Wieseler. Besides, I must guard myself against accepting his interpretation of the narrative in St. Matthew.
1069 De Stella Nova &c., Pragæ, 1606.
1070 Cosmos. vol. i. p. 92.
1071 By the astronomer, Dr. Goldschmidt. (See Wieseler, Chron. Syn. p. 72.).
1072 A somewhat different view is presented in the laborious and learned edition of the New Testament by Mr. Brown McClellan (vol. i. pp, 400-402).
1073 Our A.V. curiously translates in v. 11, ‘treasures,’ instead of ‘treasury-cases.’ The expression is exactly the same as in Deut. xxviii. 12, for which the LXX. use the same words as the Evangelist. The expression is also used in this sense in the Apocr. and by profane writers. Comp. Wetstein and Meyer ad locum. Jewish tradition also expresses the expectancy that the nations of the world would offer gifts unto the Messiah. (Comp. Pes. 118 b; Ber. R. 78.).
1074 So not only in ancient hymns (by Sedulius, Juvencus, and Claudian), but by the Fathers and later writers. (Comp. Sepp, Leben Jesu, ii. 1, pp. 102, 103.)
1075 So Archdeacon Farrar rightly computes it.
1076 An illustrative instance of the ruthless destruction of whole families on suspicion that his crown was in danger, occurs in Ant. xv. 8. 4. But the suggestion that Bagoas had suffered at the hands of Herod for Messianic predictions is entirely an invention of Keim. (Schenkel, Bibel Lex., vol. iii. p. 37. Comp. Ant. xvii. 2. 4.)
1077 There are, in Josephus’ history of Herod, besides omissions, inconsistencies of narrative, such as about the execution of Mariamme (Ant. xv. 3, 5-9 &c.; comp. War i. 22. 3, 4), and of chronology (as War i. 18. 2, comp. v. 9. 4; Ant. xiv. 16. 2, comp. xv. 1. 2, and others.)
1078 Comp. on article on Josephus in Smith and Wace’s Dict. of Christian Biogr.
1079 Hos. xi. 1.
1080 Jer. xxxi. 15.
1081 See the evidence for it summarized in ‘Sketches of Jewish Social Life in the Days of Christ,’ p. 60.
1082 Jer. xi. 1.
1083 In point of fact the ancient Synagogue did actually apply to the Messiah Ex. iv. 22, on which the words of Hosea are based. See the Midrash on Ps. ii. 7. The quotation is given in full in our remarks on Ps. ii. 7 in Appendix IX.





Grand Rapids Conference, February 16-17, 2018

Thank you to the saints of Our Savior Lutheran Church of Grand Rapids, MI for the invitation to speak to their congregation.

They want to extend the invitation to anyone interested. Here are some details:

On the Christian Conscience
Friday night, February 16th, 2018, 7 pm at Our Savior School
No registration or fees.
Has American Christianity Failed?
Saturday, February 17th, 2018, 9 AM to 3:30 PM.
Registration by 2/1/18:  $25. or 616-949-0710.  Lunch included.
9 AM Matins
9:30 AM you til lunch at Noon, Has American Christianity Failed? part 1
12:45 PM to 3:25 PM, Has American Christianity Failed? part 2
3:25 closing prayer
Join us if you can!
Lord’s Blessings,

Where the Law Should and Should Not Go: A Sermon Preached by Pr Jared Melius

A few weeks back Hope Lutheran Church hosted the Steadfast Lutheran Conference on the Three Estates. The following sermon was preached by Pastor Jared Melius of Mt. Zion Lutheran Church, Denver, CO, on Friday, July 21, 2017 to begin the conference. It is fantastic.


The Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ is this: that for the sake of the atoning sacrifice of Jesus on the cross, your sins are forgiven and you are reconciled with God. Your sins are not counted against you. This is irrespective of if your sins have been relatively minor and have just kind of collected like dirt on a filter over the years or whether you’ve had major infractions that haunt you. God thinks nothing of your sins now for the sake of Jesus. In fact, even more than that, God Himself has declared you free from all condemnation, all guilt, and all punishment. God as the almighty judge has justified the ungodly, he has released guilty prisoners who didn’t deserve it. He has released you. That is the Gospel, and there is not a truer Word of God in all the Scriptures.

We, however, are gathered here for a conference to study the Three Estates, which is not the Gospel. It is the Law. It is the three realms or over-arching stations that the Lord’s commandments – his Law! – apply to us. Now, when it comes to the Gospel, we are given merely to hear the Word in humility and believe it. That’s it. But, when it comes to the Law, we Christians are given a far more demanding duty. We must exercise wisdom when hearing the Law.

It’s not as easy, apparently, as saying, “Well, if there’s law, then isn’t it just that we’re supposed to follow it? Or at least give it our best shot?” No. There is far more than that. You will find in the    Bible places where we are urged strenuously to apply ourselves to the Law of God and follow it and grow in it. Not just anybody, but Christians. The law is highly,  highly regarded. But you will also find places in the Bible where the law is degraded in what I think are just shocking ways. In other words, there are places where Christians are told that we are still bound up to the law and if they aren’t they are not Christians. And, there are places where    Christians are told they not bound by the law and if they think they are… they are not Christians. So which is? Are we supposed to take the law seriously or not?

Well, the answer is both. We are bound to the law AND we are free from the law. Now here is the outline: Before a Christian can even begin to understand how they are bound to the law and must keep, they must FIRST understand how they are free from it. And this is best described by St. Paul in Romans 7.

He says in the strongest possible terms how we Christians are free from the law. In fact, he says it even stronger than that, that we are “dead to the law through the body of Christ.”I’ll read it: “Therefore, my brethren, you also have become dead to the law through the body of Christ, that you may be married to another – to Him who was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit for God.” 

Imagine that your heart is like a big mansion, one of those twisty kinds of mansions with all sorts of rooms and back stairways and secret passages. If your heart is like that, there are certain rooms where the law is allowed and should be given full access, but there are other rooms in your heart where the door must be shut and locked so that the law has no access. The law should not be allowed access into your confidence room. Nor into your standing before God room. It should not be allowed into the room where you consider if you will go to heaven or if God loves you. In fact, it should not even be allowed into that room where you consider if you are a good person before God’s face, because your goodness or badness is determined by Jesus’ declaration and He by grace has declared you righteous in the     Gospel – not the Law. From these rooms, the Law must be strictly forbidden. Now the problem is that the law is like a little 8-year-old boy, who is always trying to wiggle into rooms and find secret passages into a room where he does not belong.

Now some have thought that it would be safest to simply bar the whole mansion of your heart from the law. Pay no heed to it at all.   Allow it in none of the rooms! But that’s wrong. There is a place for considering the 3 estates, the godly vocations given by God and blessed by Him. In fact, if you pay careful attention here to Paul’s words in Romans 7, he says that “we should become dead to the law through the body of Christ… that we should bear fruit for God.”

Well… I have a feeling – I could be wrong – but I have a feeling that there are some of you here who are not altogether dead to the law. You’re still alive to it a bit. And so Paul’s saying that you must be dead to it will come as a great relief. Lay aside your stress about making sure you’re doing life right. You’re trying so hard to hold yourself together before your neighbor and before God Himself. Stop. God does not and He never did need your efforts; He loved you and suffered His dear Son to die for you before you ever took a breath. Before you ever thought to get things right, He already made them right in His Son Jesus Christ. You’ve done a lot of things well; and a lot of things not so well. None of it determines your standing. Jesus does.

Very well. Once that has been stapled into your conscience firm, that the Lord loves you – in Jesus and for no other reason – now we can proceed to give full consideration as to how to best to please the Lord in our vocations – free from accusation.


Tech and Tools, August 2017

I made a little list of the Tech and Tools I use to get stuff done for this weeks Wednesday What-Not. I thought I would drop the information here, and try to keep it updated as things change, and the new and better replaces the old, etc.

Tech and Tools, First Annual Edition…

I’m always poking around for different tools to get things done. I thought it might be helpful to create an inventory of the tools I’m using (with the hope that you will find something helpful here for you as well). Let me know. And if I’m missing something, send me a note.

Bible: Thomas Nelson Pocket Reference Edition
New King James Version. Center-column cross-reference. Good concordance. Nice font. Perfect size. I love this Bible. I’ve been through three of them now, and the one I have is getting fairly beaten up. It’s out of print, so if you find a box in the back of a Bible bookstore, call me.

World English Bible (
The W.E.B. is a public domain translation of the Bible. I’ve been using it a lot lately, and it is pretty good. The website isn’t that fancy. The text is good, and it is really wonderful to have a free Bible version to build things with.

Pen & Paper: Lamy Safari
I picked it up in the airport in Germany. It’s the best I’ve ever used. I always keep a piece of paper around for notes, folded like this. Just about every Wednesday What-Not idea started out as a note on my little one-sheet books.

Inbox for Gmail (
There’s no easier way to get to inbox-0. When Flamme switched he said, “I feel like I have grown-up email now.”

Google Calendar (
I’ve got lots of different calendars which different people can access. Especially helpful has been the creation of the Hope Lutheran Church Pastoral Care Calendar, which has birthdays, anniversaries, baptismal birthdays, anniversaries of deaths of members, etc.

Evernote (
I use Evernote as my to-do and project management list. I have it set up for Getting Things Done in some crazy way, using tags for projects, urgency, and contexts. I used to use a little Chinese program called for years, and like it, but I switched to Evernote because of the flexibility the various ways to capture information. I pay $3.99 a month so that I can forward emails into Evernote.

Trello (
I’ve been using Trello as a shared project management platform. Pr Flamme and I have a Trello board for pastoral care which helps us track people in the hospital, homebound visits, etc. We have an office Trello set up which helps manage the daily work of the church. The church council even has a Trello Board where reports are posted and the agenda is set, and we work off that board for more streamlined meetings. If you are a visual person, Trello is a great productivity tool.

Getting Things Done (
This is the beginning of productivity thinking for me. I’ve mentioned it before, but if we are talking tools, this is a big one.

Trip-It (
Email your travel plans and they are magically sorted, but on your calendar and into the app for easy access.

Kayak (
On the travel topic, I’ve been relying on Kayak to find flights for the last six years. I’ve tried other sites, and always come back to kayak.

Buffer (
Buffer is great for social media management. I can post things to Facebook without going to Facebook, !spread posts out through the day, etc. This helps me keep my “Four O’Clock Facebook” only engage in social media once a day plan. Pablo is a sister program that allows you to quickly edit and share images from the internet. It’s also very slick and fun to use.

Grammarly (
This Chrome plug-in is great for spell and grammar check. I’m a terrible proofreader. Grammarly does the heavy lifting for me. (Now I need to figure out how to get it to work with Evernote.) I recently downloaded the Grammarly extension for Word, and it looks promising.

WordPress ( is a WordPress site. We use Weebly for Both are great, but I like the flexibility and low-cost of WordPress.

Gimp (
This is a free graphic manipulation program that is pretty powerful. I’ve used it to make the covers for Everyone’s Luther and the other graphics for some books, etc. I’m not the best, but Gimp seems to do the trick. I’ve got all the Adobe programs, but I still haven’t made the jump from Gimp to Photoshop.

Spotify (
For music.

Player FM (
For podcasts.

MailChimp (
For Wednesday What-Nots. Also for the Around the Word devotions. We even started using MailChimp to send out a weekly newsletter for Hope.

Dropbox (
I also have One Drive and Google Drive for cloud storage, and have different things in different places for no good reason, but Dropbox seems like the easiest thing to use. I use it to backup the photos from my phone. We use it to transfer audio for TTR and video for WEtv. I have, lately, been using Google Drive and Google Docs a bit more, especially for projects that will mostly run through email. A lot of the project support files for the Germany trips are in Google Drive.

If you don’t know it, this site is pretty nice. It automates all sorts of things. When we post the Sunday Sermon audio, IFTTT sends it to Facebook and my website. When I post something on the blog IFTTT sends it out to Twitter and Facebook through Buffer. When an Issues. Etc episode is tagged with my name, IFTTT sends it to the website. All this stuff happens without me touching it.

Lulu ( )
Publishes all the books. What an amazing tool.

Logos Bible Software
I have it, and I’m using it more and more, but still not enough for me to think it was worth the price. There are so many free Bible Study tools, I don’t think you need it. The best thing about it is having the American Edition of Luther’s Works available.

SBL Greek New Testament App (link)
This one’s for your phone. I can’t recommend it enough.

(One day I’ll build a list of the best Bible Study tools online.)

And, speaking of phone stuff…

I have a Samsung Galaxy S7 with service from T-Mobile. (T-Mobile’s price is hard to beat, they don’t give you trouble about unlocking your phone, and their international plan is lights out. Free international data roaming!)

I use my phone for almost everything, including recording the Grappling (using the Cinema FV-5 app so I can lock the focus) and man-on-the-street videos, recording the audio of Bible Class, and taking and posting all the pictures from our trip. I use it for podcasts, etc. Somehow I ended up with a 256 GB SD card, so I’m able to load the guy up with books from Google Books. I have a few Evernote Widgets that pull down my urgent and phone to-dos.

I also have a Samsung tablet (Tab S2, I think) with a Bluetooth keyboard. I’ve been using this a stand-in for my computer when traveling. It can’t quite handle everything the laptop can, but it is extremely portable and fast. I’ve been trying to use it to read more, and it is really nice to cut and paste chunks of text into Evernote and Buffer. I think you’ll see more blog posts with “Reading Notes” coming along soon.

Google Books (
You can find all sorts of free old public domain books here. I’ve found a bunch of great theological resources, including Bullinger’s Critical Lexicon, and Schmid’s Doctrine of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. I’m using Christopher Wordsworth Commentary on the New Testament to fill out my notes for Revelation and 1 Peter. Ludhart is there. Luther is there. Chesterton is there. Krauth is there. I recently downloaded Athanasius’s On the Incarnation in Greek and English. It’s like having a library in your pocket.

I’m sure I’m forgetting something, but if you’ve made it this far, you probably forgot how this started.

Thanks for reading. I’m really happy to be able to touch base with you all each week.
Lord’s Blessings, and keep in touch!

Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller

Older posts
Show Buttons
Hide Buttons